I didn't see it irl, only on video. It was a freaking hen. Two crows were 'laughing' at her, so she lunged at one, grabbed its tongue with her beak and ripped it right out. Felt like I'd just watched a snuff film.

til

We are young 🥺

I KNEW IT

Nope, not again This monkey learns

Now im gonna hear that song in my head all day

Which is nice

x2

For some reason i didn't read this part of your earlier response:

The right question is what brings this consistent ideology or theme. What makes it popular enough that enough people decide to participate in it that op finds this pattern and asks it online

Now i can put the pieces together and have a rough idea where you're going with this.

Anyway, let me insist that you're asking something from the OP that it wasn't trying to give in the first place. Your approach is academic, the OP's is emotional.

I understand you think it's wrong, but that's because you're looking at this through a different lens.

Here's what i take from it:

I don't like seeing people behave this way in these circumstances; i really don't understand it. Lets talk about what you people feel in those same circumstances.

In casual communicative contexts, phrasing something as a question doesn't necessarily mean it's seeking an answer or at least not one that solves a problem. So, this can't be a pointless discussion, because it isn't a discussion at all, and certainly not an academic one. It's people sharing experiences, just a conversation. it's great you want more rigor, but asking for it here as if it were obvious misses the point: this wasn't a context that demanded rigor from the start.

Tbh, i don't think the question was meant to get an academically rigorous answer. It seems more like a complaint (just look at the rest of the post). Maybe that's why OP said "fear" a bit loosely, or maybe they don't realize that "phobia" (which is really what this is about—homophobia) can also mean repulsion. Either way, wouldn't it be better to interpret it in the best light and explain what you were aiming for—the sociological causes?

Why is it wrong and what would be the right one?