I'm committed to open source (or at the very least indie dev) more than to a single platform.
@beehaw.org
Well:
Firefox user here.
Extensions to be helpful to other people:
Fediverse extensions:
Youtube extensions:
The good: we didn't have people constantly asking the same basic questions instead of opening the support/chat community and seeing that 4 other people had made the same post the same day.
The bad: we didn't have people.
Here are my notes on the video. Formatting may be a bit broken so you can also find it on my website.
Advantges of a library economy are:
Based on Murray Bookchin's The Economy of Freedom.
Usufruct is the freedom of individual or groups to access and use (but not destroy) common resources to supply their needs - as opposed to limitation of access based on exclusive ownership.
Imagine this applied to: libraries of decor, libraries of furniture, libraries of tools. You could borrow cushion, designs, paintings, then switch things out; you could borrow a shovel for a weekend or while you need it.
_A note from Alex:
__My hometown has an art library that belongs to the city library network. They have loads of paintings, and you can borrow 3 paintings for 3 months at a time, for free, with the only obligation being that you need your home to be insured.
Bibliothèques de Grenoble
_
Guaranteed minimum resources to sustain life, that everyone should have access to regardless of their individual contribution to the community.
Libraries provide free access to knowledge (note from Alex: and fun!), but that's just one component.
Libraries of consumables (food, drugs, toiletries...) might be difficult to imagine. A library economy needs dispensaries of necessities: a cooking collective, with common farming, could work to provide everyone with enough food.
An emphasis on slow fashion by diverse retailers would ensure clothing that lasts, in the style we like. For this we'd need a vast reorientation of all our priorities.
People must choose themselves how they labour and how they leisure. Nothing should be defined by, or limited to, what they contribute themselves. They should always get satisfaction and joy from what they do.
For the things that no one enjoys, find ways to rotate, gamify or transform these tasks.
Based on 5 laws of library science, first conceived by S.R. Ranganathan in 1931.
Visualize pockets of library economies that connect with one another and end up spreading worldwide!
You should post here: !lemmy_support@lemmy.ml
This is not a technical support community.
(but also i've had the same issue since the last lemmy update, i suppose a bug made its way in there.)
As said above, but shorter: the videos are stored on the servers like on a "regular" video hosting website. If there are peers available, then it relies on P2P for whatever's working; if not, it acts like a regular video website.
To share fragments of a video I need to be consciously in the video?
I actually have no idea about this one!
Communities don't need to have a single specific language and being able to share in our own language in a general community, especially outside of English, would be amazing. I know I've posted some content to book-related communities in French and was glad not to post to an empty French community, and I got some interaction on this.
Agree with Flaky that we really need a default language choice to not have to set it up every time, though.
I think it's good etiquette. I also think that as you said:
I find it frustrating, personally–but only if I’m not currently paying for the material, because if I am then I’m logged in and likely won’t notice.
I never share a paywalled article on purpose, but since I don't notice if it's paywalled for my premium subscriptions, I often get it wrong. I'd really rather see a Lemmy-side automated flag rather than users having to check themselves every time they share (and often failing, because they're humans).
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...