I'm sure this guy has pissed off more than his fair share of powerful people in the past, so I find it slightly hard to believe that he wouldn't have considered the safety of his family prior to venturing on the most flamboyant slap in the face to the most powerful man and known assassin in his country...yah know??

I'm of the opinion that any rapist should have that permanently affixed to their name whenever mentioned: "Rapist Donald Trump".

Elon announced he was changing Twitters name to better reflect the core values of the company. Twitter is now to become "X Æ A-1488".

All it takes for evil to succeed is for "good" men to do nothing.

While terrible on so many levels, giving third party developers the boot is, ironically, precisely the best thing you could do for a competitor like the threadiverse since some will inevitably come over here. Experienced developers who know the domain will suddenly be putting that experience to work to make the threadiverse better. Is that really what Reddit wanted?

Guess we're about to find out. Their loss is our gain.

To be fair, they've got the killed-or-injured-by-a-software-driven-vehicle market virtually cornered.

Did that author actually call BS part of the fediverse?

Don't apologize. Instead, thank people for their patience.

*ludicrous

This is amazing. Cryptography is truly the sorcery of our age.

Andrew Tate offered to train Musk, which could be important since they'll be fighting behind bars.

A slap on the wrist just confirms FIFA's complicity.

Oh boy, here we go.

Because executive compensation is less about incentives and more about siphoning company resources off to family members of the oligarchy.

John What-have-you-done-any-better is hard to fit on a business card.

You misspelled dumdum, dumdum. (/s just in case that wasn't clear)

The Chase case is a terrible example for several reasons laid out here: https://www.documentcloud.org/...

That's an amicus brief for this case, filed with the Supreme Court by the great-great-grandson of Teddy Roosevelt, a historian who spends a great deal of time explaining the full context of the fourteenth from actual historical record and case law, including (and excoriating) Chase.

A lawyer and commentator for Lawfare declared it the best of the briefs he's seen, and he cited other excellent ones as well that do not rely on Chase.

It's 54 pages, so not for the timid, but I found it a fascinating read and anyone wanting to know the actual history will as well.

Homey don't play dat.

If this chucklehead ever sees the general, we need to crucify him with this conspicuously braindead stuff that literally no one, even the nutballs, want around them.

Rest assured, it'll be a slew of LLM output tweaked by unpaid interns this time. That's what this is about.