This is going to make roads more dangerous
@lemmy.blahaj.zone
I suppose it'd be people showing they're allies, good urban design like bathrooms instead of male and female bathrooms
policies like "if you're an ass towards queer people you get kicked out"
people wearing gnc clothing and nobody batting an eye
no hate being present is also a big one, so i try to do my part by removing terf and anti-women's rights stickers, or putting a nice fat pro-queer/pro-women's sticker on them. or something unrelated altogether. I disacknowledge hatred and will deny them a platform.
honestly, it's really the same things that make anyone irrespective of gender feel safe to be themselves: a supportive environment, that's not toxic, and inclusive
Mediocre policies, it'd be better to:
* Assuming a conservative estimate of the discretionary income - to be about half that of disposable incomes -, in the US that'd yield a median discretionary income of about $31,000 a year (2026). So a fine would then be about $310.
If we take a random amount of $40k in stocks and bonuses, that gets bumped up to $1,110 as a fine.
Someone whose discretionary income is about $5,000 and nothing else, then would have a fine of $50.
A fascist billionnaire would be fined $10 billion, probably closer to $100 billion (to negate the growth of assets).
Instead of a labourer having to pay 15% of his monthly wage and getting robbed, while the fascist billionnaire pays what might as well be nothing, both now face equal consequences.
No, that was the Attlee government. Or Harold Wilson's.
While Starmer's is economically much better than the Tory shit, it's still rather centrist and he's got other issues that undoubtedly everyone more right-wing than him also has.
Why not change the measure of the nuclear efficiency of fusion from hydrogen to helium, to be from 0.007 into 0.006?
Boom, now only hydrogen can be made.
Or if we put it to 0.008, boom, now everything fuses way faster.
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...