Bernie has good intentions, but he was AI-pilled by Geoffrey Hinton, who ironically also has good intentions. However, they are both out of touch with reality.
@lemmy.ca
Bernie has good intentions, but he was AI-pilled by Geoffrey Hinton, who ironically also has good intentions. However, they are both out of touch with reality.
I'm confident enough about this that I've registered a prediction on Long Bets.
"No LLM-based AI will surpass 70% on the ARC-AGI-3 leaderboard, with a cost of $1000 or less, before June 2028." - https://longbets.org/973/
I'm curious if you'd really disagree with the premise, and would you (or anyone here on Lemmy) be willing to put money down to challenge the bet? (Long Bets always donates any winnings to a registered non-profit of the winner's choice, though it's a $200 minimum).
Are you saying that LLMs can currently reason? How do you explain their low score on ARC-AGI-3? Do you think Transformer LLM architectures will be capable of reasoning within the next two years without some new breakthrough? What mechanism in the architecture allows them to reason?
Companies are only shooting themselves in the foot in the long term if they stop hiring junior engineers, and most of that work is not being replaced, it's being shifted to the senior engineers who now have to babysit AIs that can't actually do the job for any extended period of time. If you're accepting AI code into a codebase without thorough review, then you're also shooting yourself in the foot in the long term, because even the senior engineers won't know the codebase after a while. If you're doing thorough reviews in order to catch the AI bugs, well then you're probably better off coding it yourself correctly in the first place, unless you've already allowed your skills to atrophy.
Do you really think AIs are reasoning when you ask them to troubleshoot technical issues? You may be lucky if the issue is already in their training data, but anything even slightly novel, and the AI is just going to bullshit an answer, and I guess you're going to follow it blindly, since you don't know enough to come up with an answer yourself.
Besides all that, how is open source AI going to stop junior developers from losing their jobs?
I like Ed, but not a fan of this style of teasing. Reminds me of conspiracy theory communities. We'll see what he has I guess.
The Luddites didn’t hate machines. They were gifted artisans resisting a capitalist takeover of the production process that would irreparably harm their communities, weaken their collective bargaining power, and reduce skilled workers to replaceable drones as mechanized as the machines themselves. Their struggle has been tragically warped into a caricature when it is more relevant than ever.
Here's the article. It's an excellent read: https://www.currentaffairs.org/...
Good reminder to donate to web.archive.org
Not a fan of Poilievre by any means, but I'm glad we don't live in a world where he immediately takes the anti-trans attack angle. I won't be surprised if he does in a few days or weeks, but I'll take what I can get.
Yes, probably, but you know what, even if the DEI was performative, it had a real positive impact for tens of thousands of employees and the culture set by the media empire they control, and now we don't even have that.
I think people need to appreciate that Mozilla is probably the only company in the world who will allow you to turn off ads like this, for free.
Looks like the maintainer burned out. Maybe give them some time to recover.
Some good debunking here: https://www.flyingpenguin.com/...
Buddhist Copilot builds apps with sublime coding standards, and on the last iteration it runs rm -rf * .git before it recites a koan on impermanence.
The full quote is even better.
What they have done is engage in this act of economic terrorism against the entire world. They basically threatened any ship that's moving through the Straits of Hormuz. Well, as the President showed, two can play at that game, and if the Iranians are going to engage in economic terrorism, we're gonna ... abide by a simple principle that no Iranian ships are getting out either.
That pregnant pause in the "..."
Narrator: In this moment, he knew he fucked up.
"Multi-account containers" is an extension built by Firefox themselves, but you need to install it manually. It allows you to open tabs that are effectively separate "profiles" so that you can sign into sites with different accounts. https://addons.mozilla.org/...
This was 100% a marketing stunt to get their startup's name in the news. And here we are. The unitree robot is designed to fold up for transport, and it comes in a shipping container.
Qapla'! Today is a good day to dine.
There ought to be a legal fund for these deepfake lawsuits so we can sue every one of these scummy companies out of existence. I'd donate to it.
Yeah, it's wild to me that a professor would trust their students to do this online without any proctoring in any age. I can understand why he might not have wanted to use proctoring software, if they are easily circumvented. I guess the correct option -- in-person proctoring via contracted companies, is just too resource-intensive.
The main difference is still AI though. Even if students cheated in the past, they would have had to flip through their textbook or their notes, and know where to find the answer, then put it in their own words. Now they don't even have to do that small amount of work to cheat.
It's nuts to think that these are 3rd year health-science undergrads who will soon be out there in the world having only learned an over-reliance on AI.
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...