Imperialism and hegemony aren't the same though?

In the meme. I don't know about irl. But in the meme his mum's rejoycing because she's supposed to be thinking he's dead.

He did the right thing after having mªde a career doing the wrong thing. He's not a hero by any standard that hasn't been bastardized by american culture. Just a guy wo finally did something non-harmful.

I'll never understand why the "pull yourself up by your bootstraps" people see it as everybody else's responsibility to cushion the inumerable blows from their abusive relationships with their employers.

It was. I trully whiffed it there!

This is actually a glow up

Yes, and yes.

Nothing says separating from state control like building your own state off bucks

It's faketran

The situation is that proprietary_blend committed suicide

Username checks out

But subsidizing their abusive employer is, right?

Surely you don't think things like the Southport and Nowak riots weren't violent, do you? Aside from that

as long as we can

Generally does not mean "after we have".

Find i'm less likley to find seething racists commenting under a news headline, but i also don't think those kinds of stories circulate as much on here.

In a way I think it's more negative. As in you often expect that a person you trust cannot/wouldn't do things, particularly if they harm you or your interests. The "cannot" side leads closer to dependence, again⁺ imo, but overall you'd also be more vulnerable than someone who's merely willing to benefit from asking for a favour.

what you describe is more like dependency than trust, imo

@?

Are you one of the maintainers? If so, and you have time, I have some questions. How has the rise of llms affected your usage and/or revenue? Do you fave the same sorts of challenges as Tailwind in attracting users as sponsors? Has the effect been more or less dramatic?

Gorgomillo. He's a peculiarly friendly ghost who is, or at least used to be, known to haunt a Pizza Express in Woking.

What do you actually agree with in that article? Not philosophically. specifically about how they detect and evaluate the evidence they present.