Can we still say 'Amerikkkrakker'?

Can you help me understand how the whole fediverse thing works? It seems more decentralized than reddit.

The IRA for one.

Related, but does anyone know how much truth their is to the idea that Vavilov was sent to the gulags because of his opposition to Lashekoism?

Wisconcom?

The limitations of existence makes it meaningful

That is a very good take away.

Was that in a speech or a book? Would love to get the full context.

In terms of afterlife, I would say I'm agnostic. When i say I have appreciation for the Dharmic religions, I don't mean that I believe in the supernatural aspects of those religions, more that I appreciate the philosophical undertones present within them. Specifically stuff like Indra’s Net, or anything that stresses that “things aren’t really things, but things are the relationships between things”, if that makes sense. Just the stuff that stresses interconnection and nuance, i find that I can really appreciate and see a lot of crossover with systems science and Marxism. Also, Swami Vivekanda has written some very interesting texts on Socialism based on his time in the USSR, which I found pretty interesting.

I do agree religion isn’t the end all, be all, and i generally have disdain for religion, i do find that those philosophies have a lot to be appreciated, especially when compared to the purely black and white thinking of abrahamic religion.

You're honestly probably right. Maybe it is having this image of myself in my head, that when the time comes, I shouldn't let the emotions overwhelm me, and I should be able to remain stoic and "exit the world with dignity" or something like that.

Cool, I think that's the same conclusion I've come to aswell. Haven't been able to put words to it that well though. What are your thoughts on Gonzalo in general?

Any specific ones i should check out?

Maybe for me, it is that idea of "clinging" to life, and struggling with that.

Agreed. I feel like the second paragraph you had there, is exactly what i was referring to. I feel like I can say that pretty easily, and do feel like I honestly believe it, but when push comes to shove in a moment of emotional intensity regarding death, that whole thing just crumbles before me and is replaced with "but I don't want to die". Some sort of "clinging" to life.

This is exactly the kind of mindset I've been trying to adopt. Being able to see the deep interconnection in the world and seeing how everything is related in connection and change. Trying to apply it to myself has been difficult. Sometimes it feels like my body/mind fights back against this too, there are times when I've felt I've made progress on this, but then, somewhere in my brain, for some reason, i feel forced to contemplate specific organs of my body, such as my heart, and how that might feel to go out, and then the anxiety gets going, and then it feels like there's actually some sharpness in the heart itself, and then I worry about dying and go down that rabbit hole.

Agreed. I do think the ideas present within Vedanta and Zen Buddhism (the only two that I've studied to any extent) do have some really cool ideas that have a lot of overlap with scientific socialism and Marxism. Specifically stuff like Indra's Net, or anything that stresses that "things aren't really things, but things are the relationships between things", if that makes sense. Just the stuff that stresses interconnection and nuance, i find that I can really appreciate and see a lot of crossover with systems science and Marxism. Also, Swami Vivekanda has written some very interesting texts on Socialism based on his time in the USSR, which I found pretty interesting.

I do agree religion isn't the end all, be all, and i generally have disdain for religion, i do find that those philosophies have a lot to be appreciated, especially when compared to the purely black and white thinking of abrahamic religion.

I think it more comes from how a lot of supposed mental disorders, are more of a conflict of that individual and the society they live in. If society was structured in a way for ADHD people to be able to contribute that is structured around how their brain works, there wouldn't be a disability in the first place. Not all, of course, but many. How we shouldn't be positing these people as 'broken' because their brains work slightly different, but because our society isn't structured in a way to allow them to contribute in a way that works best for them.

You should not call yourself a communist if you're an American and do not know about AIM and their struggle imo.

Was what was done in the Soviet Union, at least during Lenin's leadership, considered to be Dogmatic Leninism? What seperates Dogmatic Leninism from Marxist-Leninism?

Also, would you say Marxism-Leninism-Maoism is an adaptation of these material conditions? Or a higher stage of development. What even differentiates the two?

That makes a lot of sense to me. I think my question is really coming from the modern day divide between MLs and MLMs. I'm still trying to understand what differentiates Marxism Leninism applied to its material conditions, versus a new stage of development in ML theory.

Indeed I have passed out, many times. It's always a terrible experience, or, incredibly uncomfortable probably. It feels like I'm losing my mind when I'm passing out to be completely honest. It feels almost psychedelic coming out of unconsciousness for me. Excluding anesthesia, more thinking about passing out while getting blood drawn or from heat or something.

I wish the idea of simply fainting from existence was comforting, but historically that phenomenon has always been uncomfortable as hell for me.