dymaxion
0
6
dymaxion

@infosec.exchange

Thinking about security, failure, change, art, and living. Recruiting barbarians; complicate your narratives. Fractional CISO to startups via Systems Structure Ltd. HEL/NYC/LON

dymaxion 2 points 2 days ago

@EFreethought
@BlueMonday1984 Someone should remind the powers that be that APFSDS is not an anti-personnel round. Possibly by letting them try it.

path: 0 26246464 26268228 26277967, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
dymaxion 3 points 8 months ago

@geeksam
@V0ldek @cstross Don't worry, any video not shot from behind safety glass will suffer from rapid existence failure

path: 0 22082714 22086328 22100007, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
dymaxion 1 point a year ago path: 0 18532181, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
dymaxion 1 point 2 years ago path: 0 13439016 13439030 13439037 13439098 13439101 13452864, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
dymaxion 1 point 2 years ago

@mattblaze@federate.social
Normally when I see tilt/shift used, it's for lenses that can both tilt and shift? And when stuff can only shift, they're marked as perspective correcting? But it's been a while since I've been looking at new glass

path: 0 14757658, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
dymaxion 1 point 2 years ago

@mattblaze@federate.social
Oh, for a photograph, yeah, definitely — I was just thinking about the lens side where folks tend to label them somewhat more accurately. I mean, I'm sure that someone has taken a picture looking up at a tall building in corrected perspective but looking like it's an architectural model, but not often.

path: 0 14757658 14760485 14760724, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

thanks for using Leebra!

go to feed...