Yes by non-profits. What VC backed python runtimes are you referring to?

Both deno and bun felt like experiments in VC funded language runtimes and both of them failed. It reinforced the idea to me that you cannot productize runtimes and they need to be funded by other means

Yes, mod+arrow in tabbed mode which is the same for focusing in tile mode. It feels very ergonomic

I use tabbed mode for my laptop as well because of limited screen real estate.

Hmm but sway can do full screen apps in a workspace too with tabs. I think the title of the window is arguably more important than showing a little piece of the window when navigating

You mentioned self hosting but if you want something without any lock in, there’s https://prose.sh/ — it open source, supports images, markdown, and you bring your own editor.

I’ve been a paying Kagi user for years and I don’t see why I would use this browser. The only selling point to me is WebKit and there are only projects that support that on Linux

Hmm it looks like they only tested KDE (KWin) compositor. I’d love to see how various Wayland server implementations impact performance since the compositor controls when it commits frames to the display controller.

That’s the claim but buildx is extremely limited on podman.

The reason I want to see a compositor comparison is because on Wayland the implementation really matters. This isn’t actually a x vs Wayland comparison, it’s actually x vs 1 Wayland compositor.

For all we know there’s a KWin perf issue that has nothing to do with Wayland itself.

I don’t use vscode so I can’t help too much beyond saying Distrobox is awesome and I’ve been using it for my headless dev machine for a few months and won’t go back to anything else.

Have you tried Debian based distros? I would try Debian since it’s not a rolling release like the others you mentioned.