ferricoxide
0
17
ferricoxide

@blahaj.zone

Ex of Twitter (and many others before that) by way of mastodon.social (same user ID across a lot of platforms) and evil.social (R.I.P.). Most of what I post would probably be considered "shit-posting" as I tend to type out whatever comes to mind without much filtering.

ferricoxide 18 points 9 months ago

@theHRguy@lemmy.world

Reason I don't have any cameras is the whole "I want to wholly control my data" thing. There's just no good reason a "cloud" service can't use Client-Side encryption, other than they want to leave open the possibility of selling you out.

path: 0 21710485, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 8
ferricoxide 9 points 5 months ago

@HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip @sanitation@lemmy.radio

This seems like it could be a move like Verizon trying to force adult content off of Tumblr. It feels like there's a non-trivial percentage of content-creators that work thorugh Kickstarter that could be forced to find new platforms. Especially given how nebulous the "safe" term is.

Feels like, in about five years, the internet will only be usable by 5yos.

path: 0 23717821 23719917, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
ferricoxide 7 points 9 months ago

@ickplant@lemmy.world Gryff definitely thinks he's a lapdog, moreso, even, than his 52lb #pittie predecessor (she was more-insistant on laying next to me; he wants to be on me). Fortunately, the 65lb dog we adopted was 8lbs overweight (so, now that he's in proper trim, he's "only" 57lbs).

#dogs
#DogsOfMastodon
#FediDogs
#staffy

Picture of a tan Staffordshire Bull Terrier in classic "round-dog" pose while laying in the photographer's lap

path: 0 21557366 21557801 21558043, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 2
ferricoxide 5 points 5 months ago path: 0 23587151 23593050, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
ferricoxide 4 points 9 months ago

@ickplant@lemmy.world

Gonna guess that the picture didn't make the jump from your Lemme-based instance to this SharKey-based instance. :(

path: 0 21557366 21557801 21558043 21558150 21559316, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
ferricoxide 3 points 9 months ago

@ickplant@lemmy.world

I've got a 57lb staffy. He'd definitely not get carried around just because he was lazy. :p

path: 0 21557366, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 5
ferricoxide 3 points 9 months ago

@SpacetimeMachine@lemmy.world

Yup, but if you can reduce or remove failure-cases without reducing security or making other sacrifices it makes little sense not to.

A system with local cache (hedging against Internet outages), batteries (hedging against power failures) and strong CSE (hedging against opt-out third-party access to your data) provides a significantly higher quality solution than something like Ring or even standard CCTV.

path: 0 21710485 21711171 21711968 21712065 21713285, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
ferricoxide 2 points 9 months ago

@mlody@lemmy.world it gets worse: first UNIX system I used (SPARCstations running SunOS 4.3) was spring of 1989. First Linux was 1992 using the 0.98a kernel.

path: 0 21833969 21838786 21839603, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
ferricoxide 2 points 9 months ago

@mlody@lemmy.world

I used to be purely a KSH user …20+ years ago. At that point in time, if you were running a SysV-derived OS (for me, Irix and Solaris), it was hard to beat (and, if you invoked "POSIX shell" was KSH's were the semantics the shell implemented). That said, one of the bigger pain-points of KSH (back then) was that a lot of the default packagings were kind of rubbish: if you wanted to retain your sanity, you'd replace them with a KSH93 implementation. But it's been since my Solaris days ended that I've dicked with KSH (as the Linux implementations were often just BASH running in "compatibility mode" rather than Real KSH™ or PD-KSH).

If you're writing shell scripts, the features in recent BASH implementations make it a pretty solid choice.

path: 0 21833969, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 4
ferricoxide 2 points 9 months ago

@BanMe@lemmy.world

Storage reliability/off-siting.

Scenario:

Someone throws something flammable at your front door (maybe even as innocuous as the classic "flaming bag of poo" prank. Nobody's home to notice. Fire burns the house down. Prankster was careless and caught on camera. Do you get footage from a slagged CCTV system?

path: 0 21710485 21711171 21711968, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
ferricoxide 2 points 9 months ago

@mlody@lemmy.world

If you mean computers that "displayed" via printing rather than having a video output, yes: my highschool lab had a couple old ones (they'd actually retired a punchcard system two years before I got to 9th grade)

First computers in our house were various iterations of TRS-80s and a couple of CP/M (or was it MPM) boxes from Altos. As a 7yo, I taught myself 6502 assembler on a (fresh from the factory) Apple ][ my dad had bought (interpreted languages, like BASIC — even the "compiled" BASIC options — were dog slow, back then).

path: 0 21833969 21838786 21839603 21839952 21842001, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
ferricoxide 2 points 6 months ago

@WanderWisley@lemmy.world

What percentage of "first movie was based on a popular novel; all subsequent ones were purely the product of screen-writers" movie series didn't fall into the "all subsequent installments suck" trap?

path: 0 23468510, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
ferricoxide 2 points 6 months ago path: 0 23465328 23470977, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
ferricoxide 2 points 5 months ago path: 0 23588491 23589989 23591074 23591638 23593160, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
ferricoxide 1 point 9 months ago path: 0 21568691 21581650, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
ferricoxide 1 point 5 months ago path: 0 23614075 23616785, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
ferricoxide 1 point 6 months ago path: 0 23448608 23448728, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2

thanks for using Leebra!

go to feed...