frevaljee
0
48
frevaljee

@kbin.social

frevaljee 57 points 3 years ago

Google has already been a worthless pos for years. Impossible to get relevant results, even with operators. You just get ads and irrelevant SEO sites. And adding "reddit" at the end of the query will probably not work so well in the future either, seeing how that site has also gone to shit.

And they have already tried monopolising the entire internet with their amp bullshit.

So this is just in line with their vision of making the whole internet into a pile of burning shit under their total control.

path: 0 1550213 1550847, hotness: undefined, score: 57, children: 3
frevaljee 40 points 3 years ago

SOI SOI SOI

path: 0 1239982, hotness: undefined, score: 40, children: 6
frevaljee 10 points 3 years ago

Yeah it's crazy, they also kicked out the chairman of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD), David Nutt because he used data to show that the UK ranked the harm of drugs incorrectly, and showed that using MDMA was less harmful than horseback riding.

He was asked to go because he cannot be both a government adviser and a campaigner against government policy.

I guess facts have no place in government policy.

path: 0 592228 594843, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
frevaljee 9 points 3 years ago

They didn't care/enforce it during the whole anime_titties/worldpolitics shenanigans, so either new or enforced when they feel like it. Centralised control sure is great.

path: 0 404772 405669 405969, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
frevaljee 8 points 3 years ago

Wasn't usa founded by literal puritans? So it sorta makes sense from a historical/cultural perspective

path: 0 409406 409936 412763, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 4
frevaljee 8 points 3 years ago

Grond

path: 0 1259047 1259655 1259740, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 5
frevaljee 8 points 3 years ago

About the second point, it would be neat if "subs" could federate somehow.

path: 0 1841101 1842713, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 2
frevaljee 5 points 3 years ago

I'm bleeding, making me the victor

path: 0 307182 307915 309083, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
frevaljee 4 points 3 years ago

Yes ofc, their focus used to be fun and balloon animals

path: 0 499154 500429, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
frevaljee 4 points 3 years ago

If you click on "more" you can also see everyone who up/downvoted and boosted a comment/post. So seeing that you upvoted/boosted yourself might be frowned upon by some. But who cares

path: 0 625817 626500 627853 628860 633593, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
frevaljee 4 points 3 years ago

Or a coin

path: 0 544752 545058 547320, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
frevaljee 4 points 3 years ago

Oh yes the voluntary dietary habit of taking a sentient being's life against its will because it's tasty and I can't be bothered to learn how to cook properly using plants.

path: 0 4487567 4487847 4488571 4489153 4489396 4492965, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
frevaljee 3 points 3 years ago

Mm, the stolen pus-juice from the raped mothers of murdered children.

path: 0 1369046 1369135 1369253 1380577, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
frevaljee 3 points 3 years ago

"vegan", "egg-fried", hmmmm 🤔

path: 0 422433, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
frevaljee 3 points 3 years ago

Bacon though

path: 0 1932777, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
frevaljee 3 points 3 years ago path: 0 1977392 2033549, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
frevaljee 3 points 3 years ago

Rattlesnake

path: 0 1289783 1292526, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
frevaljee 2 points 3 years ago

I first have to say that I really appreciate your tone and your thought out arguments. Most of these types of discussions tend to devolve into non-constructive obstinacy.

And this particular area is a very grey and complex one, so I admit it is not completely black or white for me. And these are big issues that we humans honestly will most likely not solve in any way that either of us would be happy with.

I agree with you on many points, like you have pointed out. You seem to be compassionate, empathetic, and rational.

As a non-vegan, this is one place I get kinda confused trying to see things from your point of view. Like I told the other guy, if I hunt 1 deer, I know I only hurt a single organism. I dont get any thrill out of it, I basically see it as part of Mother Nature’s grocery store. It’s a chore I don’t hate, but I see it more like a job than a hobby.

I think this comes into where I believe our disagreement is. We mostly align in the utlitiarian aspects (I'm not really utilitarian, but I'll get to that), but we differ in the aspect of commodification. I.e. I do not think we should see sentient beings as commodities. For example, I would not eat an animal who died in an accident. I assume, for instance, that you would not eat your dog if it died in a car crash, and I extend that reasoning to other animals as well.

Again, I feel we’re both in agreement modern mass farming is our real opponent, not each other. If we all had personal garden plots that fed our families, I feel that would solve a lot of these issues for both sides of these vegan vs omnivore discussions.

Completely agree. The optimal approach in my opinion would be to reduce the impact of farming in general, but at the same time not see animals as commodities. Also, even if I would view hunting as a viable way of reducing suffering (which one can argue from a utilitarian standpoint, but I personally don't for other reasons), we cannot sustain our population on hunting alone. Similarly I think we can't have a functioning society like we do today with only small scale food production. We would need to either make bigger changes in the societal structure (not very likely), or we need to optimise farming with regards to environmental impact and "collateral damage" (more likely, but still difficult).

What does the world do with domesticated animals if there is no longer a need for them?

This is a hypothetical non-issue in my honest opinion. There is no likely scenario where the entire planet would turn vegan over night. Also, it is not an argument for continuing breeding animals into suffering and death. If anything it is an argument for stopping all of it after this generation of farm animals.

Also, my personal view (even if perhaps not all vegans agree) is to be non-interventionistic. I.e. I don't think we are gods (like some other commenter said here before) who have a responsibility of maintaining nature at some arbitrary point that we think is the desired status quo. I simply think we should not unnecessarily cause harm, suffering, and death in our daily lives. As far as practicable and possible of course.

Raising livestock isn’t cheap or easy, but if it’s not a viable commercial product, who will invest that time and energy into them?

Two things. First, virtually all animal food industry today is heavily subsidised and it would not exist without those subsidies. Second, I don't think we should breed animals into existence just so that they can exist. This is also another opinion that is perhaps not too common amongst all vegans, and it is a bit of a tangent. But I am somewhat of an anti-natalist, both with human and non-human animals. No one can suffer if they haven't lived. And there is no reason to making beings exist just for the sake of existing. And if that existence is prolonged suffering ending with execution, it does not make sense to say that it is justified.

That owl article was interesting! But I think it is quite absurd in a way that we have fucked up nature so much that we think we should kill a bunch of animals as an attempt to unfuck it.

I hope you felt I’ve been respectful and genuine with you.

You have been very respectful, it is very rare to meet someone online with such a respectful and understanding tone when you are discussing differing opinions! I hope I haven't been too preachy, I also just want you to understand my view.

I can highly recommend this video by Ed Winters. I agree with a lot of his opinions, and he is much more well-spoken and good at explaining arguments than I am.

https://youtu.be/Z3u7hXpOm58

path: 0 4638811 4639267 4641131 4645832 4692461 4693660 4698475, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
frevaljee 2 points 3 years ago

I don't think I follow your reasoning tbh. What exactly are you comparing? You said that capitalists favour intervening governments, which is simply not true. Not in any general sense anyway.

Anarcho capitalism is probably as far into anarchy you can go. They want to completely abolish the state and enforce property rights privately.

Or are you saying that such a society will fall into some kind of feudalism? At the core of anarcho capitalism is the NAP which is not really compatible with feudalism. In feudalism you have a hierarchy not based on voluntarism, and that would therefore not be anarcho capitalist.

Do you imply that we need a strong state with a monopoly on violence to keep us in check, otherwise we would descend into chaos? Thats a pretty bleak and pessimistic view of mankind.

path: 0 1921827 1925171 1925642 1932518 1937148 1942316 1947595 1980544, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 6
frevaljee 2 points 3 years ago path: 0 2084150 2085051 2087725, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

thanks for using Leebra!

go to feed...