Oh my fucking god if Harris runs again and the DNC decides It’s Her Turn I am going to fucking lose it

Guys, are we winning yet?

Guys?

This is the most correct reply to this article that I’ve seen so far

I swear to god, the powers that be are legitimately trying to fucking kickstart ecoterrorism

Wow. Just… wow.

That’ll.. show em.. I guess.. Tennessee. That’ll.. something.

Fuck, man.

You’re probably just out of date. I had some issues recently on Waterfox, realized I was running a not-super-new version, and things worked great after I updated the flatpak.

Ooooh nice, so they’re effectively going to decide if they get to actually run concentration camps in an official capacity. Delightful.

Also, I don’t expect ICEatzgruppen to abide by the court order if it doesn’t go their way

Oh shit this is awesome. I’ve got some stuff that’s wrong with my knees, and this would be fantastic.

Oooooh that’s interesting!

And stuff like this is basically impossible to harden, so assuming Ukraine has figured out a reasonably reliable way to route munitions to that area (and similar satellite C2 nexuses elsewhere), they can effectively deny Russia the ability to use much of their space-based assets!

Putting aside the fact that this is a flagrant and intentional violation of the separation of church and state: this is begging for malicious compliance

Read the passage, and then turn it into a debate for the class: assign groups in two sets, at random - pointedly not based on actual beliefs or the religion (or lack thereof) of the student in question - biblical adherents and secular adherents (that will switch off whenever this exercise occurs, to give students experience on both the pro and con side, regardless of their personal beliefs, because that is valuable in terms of learning to debate). And later, perhaps expand that into debating the points from the viewpoints of other belief sets - abrahamic, polytheistic, animist, agnostic, atheist, whatever. Not only would it technically satisfy the regs, it would also very pointedly adhere much more closely to the original intent of the separation of church and state - which is not to deny that any such belief sets exist, but that the state shall take no stance in overt support or suppression of any particular belief sets exist (or lack thereof - though that reprehensible fuckstick Scalia openly disagrees that atheism is a valid personal belief system).

Oooooh I love the 9C angle. That’s delicious. If the enemy gives you a weapon, be sure to thank them by using it against them :)

Oh hell yeah :D

If the situation were reversed, the driver of the car and all of the passengers would be dead from 173 gunshot wounds, and a shitload of bystanders would also be dead or injured

Oh yeah it 100% explodes your token usage by establishing a contentious paradigm. But that’s what the C-suites want, and they don’t understand (or care to understand) the subtleties of how this development methodology works. So we’ll all (somewhat maliciously) follow orders until they change their minds when they see the absolutely ludicrous LLM bill 🤪

For context, this is about the length of an airliner. So this was actually extremely close.

Also, I flew back into Logan yesterday, on a delta flight, though I did not discern any abrupt maneuvers or a go-around on landing 😅

Ah, you’re right - I guess I was thinking more along the lines of larger airliners. Still, this is in the realm of “uncomfortably close”.