with the same footprint and noise characteristics? please do

Self-host Navidrome. Choose any of the clients that you like. Pirate stuff from big bands, buy stuff from smaller bands.

Cons: You'd have to deal with storage and hosting and access from outside your house e.g. with Tailscale. You'd also have to tag incorrectly tagged songs (surprisingly common issue, sometimes pirates tag stuff better than the bands themselves)

why did you decide to post this without making even the most basic cursory check to see if what you're posting is even remotely true?

1. they have not failed yet.
2. they have never asked to keep servers up.

have you considered fucking not?

Yet people keep recommending products by this scummy company and pile on Firefox for slightest missteps.

It does so at the cost of latency. It does not actually predict the next frame, it renders two full frames and then interpolates one frame between them. So it looks smoother but your input also takes that much longer to be displayed on the screen

The problem with forks like that is that the authors later realise the burden of having to maintain a complex piece of software and then they fizzle out.

Her blog is worth a read: https://iczelia.net/

wdym "borderline"

I hate Denuvo as much as the next guy but it's literally Steam Deck Verified

Cryptography is notoriously easy to get wrong. If you don't know enough about it - you should not offload it to the hallucination machine, because you will not be able to verify it properly, and those who can - will not bother to.

This is not what a real audit looks like and it should not be presented as such. This "audit" is, in fact, slop.

Auditor: Security Analysis (Automated + Manual Review)

Do you not see the problem in this line?

The implementation uses real cryptographic primitives

Or this?

of course they asked for a professional one... but those that ask, must know that they are all prohibitively expensive. especially for a solo vibecoding dev like myself

then... vibe-code something else?.. why do you think that you should be making something you are not an expert in, that can potentially put your users into danger and make you liable for it? if it's a learning project - great, go wild. but if it's intended to be used, then sorry - this is just an irresponsible approach that should not be entertained by anyone. I get that you have "positive intentions" but pick some other venue that you can get right. or contribute to an existing project (being mindful of contribution guidelines).

Normally - yes, but in this case it reads as "you can guess exactly how it went"

No, talking about semicolons and tabs and spaces for the umpteenth time is not how we build real skills, and you shouldn't waste your time "thinking" about it. You should run a linter that will format it for you and you should choose formatting rules that everyone working on the codebase in the future would be mostly OK with. Splitting hairs about when to insert a semicolon ain't it.

If you don't trust the guy who "literally invented rsync in 1996" to do right by his project which he has been doing quite all right with for the past 28 years, then I don't know how to help you. I'd like to put forward an insane idea that he might know what he's doing and is not vibecoding with a blindfold on and a beer in his hand.

The games are great, if only he could, like, not open his mouth...

I'm of a firm opinion that no game needs a remake. Fixing up old games so that they can be played on modern systems - yes please. Remaking the same game but """better""" - no thanks, I'd rather see something original and new come out

There are some exceptions like Pathologic 2 which is basically a remake but also a reimagining, but those are exceedingly rare.

Ahh, I was wondering why there's a Projects next to my projects, I thought I just made a typo at some point

I think everyone should be held to the same standard. We can yell at Firefox a bit less. We should yell at Brave a lot more.

The script in the top post of this thread does a better job, since it actually checks when you have upgraded the affected packages: https://discuss.cachyos.org/...

There's also an even more thorough https://github.com/lenucksi/aur-malware-check