jdp23
0
3
jdp23

@neuromatch.social

In the process of shifting my indieweb.social account here ...

strategist, software engineer, entrepreneur, activist ... and I run the Nexus of Privacy newsletter (https://privacy.thenexus.today/, @thenexusofprivacy, @thenexusofprivacy.net on Bluesky, and https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/c/thenexusofprivacy

I've been on the fediverse for a long time, so you may know me from accounts like @jdp23 @jdp23, @jdp23, and @jdp23. I'm probably going to use this as my main "public-facing" account, although I'm still not completely sure how I'll balance this and my blahaj.zone account ... blahaj.zone is a great community, so I'm certainly not planning on leaving there, but one of the things I really like about the fediverse is the ability to have more than one account. So, we shall see!

More about me in the pinned post at https://neuromatch.social/...

#strategy #equity #justice #technology #policy #disinfo #privacy #algorithmicJustice, #intersectionality #activism #organizing #software #startups ...

And #nobot without permission. Opt-out isn't consent, but it's the only real option we have here.

jdp23 4 points a year ago

@julian yes yes yes yes!

Years ago when i first looked at NodeBB, I was thinking about it for a discussion-focused social network (kind of like the old tribe.net, or Facebook/Myspace groups), and this was a key area where forum software in general didn't meet my needs -- and it wasn't obvious how to extend it. So I rolled my own as a prototype and it's stayed as a prototype for a dozen years because trying to do a full-fledged implementation that's maintainable and scalable requires implementing a forum system, decidedly non-trivial.

path: 0 18874807, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
jdp23 1 point a year ago

@julian yeah really. in my defence I knew it was hard to do anything scalable. The prototype was good enough to explore several potential directions but the answer kept being that they could potentially work as customizations/extensions of a an existing (scalable, accessible, secure, highly customizable, very flexible) underlying platform with great moderation support, but that didn't exist yet and wow it was not the kind of thing i could just code up on my own.

I do think that for this to work the support for moderation has to be quite good both at the per-group level and at the site level. Community moderation and per-group moderation, if done well, can help a lot with the scalability. Still, site-wide moderators still have to deal with rogue and abandoned groups, and situations where group-level moderation leaves people at risk).

Of course you actually need site-wide moderation to deal with most of that stuff things if the site admin creates all the categories. And user-created categories/forums/whatever are something that would be really useful in a lot of differnet use cases, so IMHO really worth focusing on!

path: 0 18874807 18890912 18893632, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
jdp23 1 point 9 months ago

Really interesting thinking, and it makes a lot of sense to roll it out slowly. Looking forward to seeing how it works out! @julian

path: 0 21383616, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

thanks for using Leebra!

go to feed...