Social media platforms would be required to implement age verification measures to ensure youth under 16 can’t create social media accounts and allow parents to oversee social media use by 16- and 17-year-olds.

Yes.

It's tiresome how lawmakers love to put a ton of shit into a single vote.

When he's dead tho? 🤨

This is exactly the kind of thing Jesus Christ would adore.

A possible correlation would be that smartphones became much more popular and mainstream during that time.

Yeah, that's also a big factor. I think a factor would also be that EU has stricter safety laws, it's usually much harder to get a license than in the US, has better infrastructure, etc.

Not to mention that new US cars (as far as I'm aware) still don't even have a requirement to have ADAS, doesn't really help the situation. If an idiot is on their phone here, there's at least some chance that their car will brake... but even more dangerous if it's a twatmobile of course.

How is voff so much different than woof? It's pronounced like exactly the same.

How did they get it so wrong? "Mjan" doesn't even exist in Swedish, it should be mjau.

That won't remove it if it's a factory app...?

If you're living in a country with good consumer rights, I'd return it.

And people wonder how Temu and such can sell tablets so cheap... they're making their money back in many different ways.

Interesting decision from a guy who survived a handful of alleged "assassination attempts".

That's actually a very bad gateway if it's still running an nginx from 2010.

How about when they "accidentally" sent that email to all your users saying that they NEED to buy Plex Pass to continue to use remote streaming? Or when they had that "bug" in the app shortly after that, where remote streaming would give an error message saying that need to buy Plex Pass to stream your content?

Maybe they don't solicit from you, but they use dark tactics to trick your users, and that's not acceptable in my opinion.

Rural people aren't usually the ones getting reduced speed limits though, no?

I live in a city and I drive daily. I don't feel any animosity against reduced speed limits, especially when it's obviously done to save lives. What logical reason would you have to be driving 50+ in a highly populated zone?

Carbrains need to realize that they have an attitude problem, or they will never learn.

It's okay dude, you can dress and express yourself however you like, you don't need to convince us that it was all just some "social experiment".

Even the article is apathetic... they write "escorted" her back to China, when it'd actually be "kidnapped" or "abducted"...?

"I was born for this!"

What happened to "snowflakes"? I guess that just like everything else, it was projection.

How many of those thousands are actual good comments though? Last time I was there, I swear the majority of comments were from bots reposting the same comments that were in previous threads. It felt peak dead-internet.

I don't know all the numbers, but the point isn't to make money from people paying for API access, but to force people to use their official applications -- which meets their goals of farming more data/advertising money/engagement/whatever.

You can't fool me with your giant hands!

I thought one of the big problems with America's student debt was that you can't effectively default on it? That it will still persist even after filing for bankruptcy for example?