#fedi22 #belgium #italy #Europe #scouting #physics #juggling #HigherSpinGravity #esperanto #conlangs #salento #puns #teaching #SouthPark #ThisIsUs #HIMYM #OnePiece #Asterix #hep-th
@nerdica.net
#fedi22 #belgium #italy #Europe #scouting #physics #juggling #HigherSpinGravity #esperanto #conlangs #salento #puns #teaching #SouthPark #ThisIsUs #HIMYM #OnePiece #Asterix #hep-th
Electrons are not subject to the strong nuclear force that glues the protons neutrons together. This means that no attractive force would prevent electric repulsion to scatter a "electron nucleus".
From a field theory perspective, the strong nuclear force is a SU(3) gauge interaction and the electron field transforms as a singlet under that SU(3)
Strong interaction is really designed as a baryonic thing, leptons have no color charge (which is another way to say that they transform as SU(3) singlets). Leptons do not interact with gluons.
Not at tree-level anyway. See for example this list of vertices.
At loop levels, it's possible to imagine an electron decaying into neutrino+W, then W into two quarks who can then interact with gluons, but as it's down a couple of orders in perturbation theory so probably much too weak to hold a nucleus together. Not an expert in particle physics so I do not know with certainty whether a couple-of-loops interaction can have a measurable effect.
what each post produced was really high quality
I've only been participating in discussions on Lemmy groups for 3ish years, but I'm quite sure that never happened. There have always been good and bad posts, good and bad comments, civil and less civil users.
some of the ones that spontaneously come to my mind are:
- 99 luftballons
- Ievan polkka
- Cannabis
- Naruto's second opening
Not a huge ESC fan usually, but I did love the 2021 edition for the proprtion of native language songs, both in total and among the top spots
the comment that ‘upset’ me in the context you are asking is the one where the guy calls me butthurt for disagreeing with his opinion
This is not in the context they were asking though, this happened as a response to your rant.
What some of us would want to have is documented examples of what caused you to write this post.
In a comment you complained about nobody having "shared their experience in a meaningful way", but you haven't shared anything concrete either.
In the post you said:
I remember we could still have discussions about controversial topics without things getting ugly
Yet to me things do not seem to have gotten ugly when you expressed a very controversial opinion in the "taliban" post. This is were concrete examples would help understanding your point.
Some users did disrepect you about this issue in this post, and I definitely do not support that ! In the end, you are a teen getting bullied (probably by adults) for having an opinion, and this is wrong no matter how bad the opinion is.
Elle ne pénalisera aucun usager
mais
les enfants [des] familles [nombreuses], ainsi que leurs parents, ne bénéficieront plus de la réduction de 50% sur la partie variable du billet.
Des associations ont toutefois déploré la fin du billet forfaitaire à 8,30 euros.
D'un autre côté, je suis pas convaincu par le besoin de rendre ça encore moins cher pour les moins de 26 ans. J'ai peur que ça renforce l'idée que les transports en commun sont surtout fait pour ceux qui conduisent pas encore. Je me rappelle du choc en achetant le premier ticket après mes 26 ans.
si l'UE décide un jour de parler une seule langue je suis d'accord avec tous les langues européenes sauf l'anglais.
Si l'UE devait décider d'une seule langue, je pense que ça ne devrait pas être la langue nationale d'un état membre. Une langue construite comme l'Esperanto serait plus appropriée à mon avis, et aurait en tout cas plus de chance d'être acceptée par les différents états/peuples.
@SuperSpecialNickname
You cannot log in to beehaw.org with you lemmy.ml account, but you can react to beehaw's content form lemmy.ml.
Just paste the url of the beehaw post or comment that you want to interact with (vote, comment) in lemmy.ml's search bar.
So, to summarize:
- you browse beeehaw while being offline
- you copy the url of the post or comment you want to interact with (under the colored fediverse icon)
- you paste it in lemmy.ml's search and normally you will find it
What marketing departments dominated by men think works is not the same thing as what actually works
In this case, isn't it because the market evolved faster than they could keep up with? Probably there was a time where most of their customers were "macho men", so these adds would work in marketing.
From (the French-speaking part of) Belgium, 6 years of primary and 6 years of secondary. Nothing inbetween as that's already 12 years. Secondary usually happens within the same school although there are two divisions within it:
- programs are designed for three cycles ("degrés") of two years (D1, D2, D3)
- teacher's diploma follow a division in two "degrés" of three years : teachers for the inferior one (DI) have a bachelor and teachers for the superior one have a master. In the near future the diploma's will change but the distiction is mostly going to stay
In this latter sense, "inferior secondary" would be the equivalent to middle school and "superior secondary" the one for high school, although as I have explained it is not as separated as in the US, Italy, France or others. As someone who teach in the superior secondary "degré", I do usually introduce myself as a high-school teacher when talking to people from other countries.
Why limit yourself to people that speak a certain language when it's irrelevant to the topic?
Speaking english is also limiting oneself to people that speak a given language.
Looks interesting, but after a quick skim it also looks quite simplistic.
What strikes me in particular is how they claim that simple inequalities fix complex theories. Special relativity relies on more than the existence of a limit speed. Quantum mechanics relies on more postulates than just the existence of a minimal exchanged action. In particular, if all those statements were really implying both GR and QFT, how could they be consistent?
The maximal force is something I am not at all familiar with, and that I definitely plan to learn more about when I have the time. From what I understand here, it was long known about general relativity, but has been compared with QFT only recently (the statement "All apparent counter-examples to maximum force disappear when explored in detail" is only justified with papers from last year) so should probably be considered very carefully as an observation about the world.
Another statement that bugs me is the following
The world-wide search for observations beyond general relativity was unsuccess-
ful
Observations at large scale are so incompatible with general relativity that we had to postulate that unknown forms of matter make up most of the universe's content.
Je ne m’y connais pas beaucoup en pièces, je vois ce fil depuis !belgique
Pareil ici. La raison pour laqielle j'ai mentionné les pièces rouges c'est qu'on en a de moins en moins, ce qui a carrément été jusqu'à abolir les paiement par pièces de 1 et 2 cents. Je me demande si ça a impacté les frappes d'autres pièces
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...