yeah, that's the whole point of the game. "trading" is the one that will not work in the long term. staying in the index fund is the good option.
@lemmy.world
appreciate the feedback - obviously this is a rather simplified game trying to deliver a message. my personal experience is that having all that extra information in the real world doesn't really translate to beating the market as well. the buffett experiment is my go to in that sense
at the core it, it's a fun little game and not much more a lot of people do "chart reading" to predict the market and this kind of pokes fun at that
the idea is trying to time the market (whether buying or selling) is very hard and the s&p500 usually wins over the mid-to-long run
and the other playing a couch is just to show how little of an effort it takes to make more money than trading - an inanimate object in an index fund can outperform you.
the two lines are certainly harder/confusing to follow, i preferred the absolute numbers at the top. the preachy thing is certainly a choice, i do want to make a point with this. the whole thing is based on that tone of voice. i hear you, it'll turn some people off and i think i'm ok with it. appreciate the honest feedback.
yes but even "simpler" than that - buy the S&P500 (it's an index fund, average of all the the top 500 companies in the stock market) and hold. over the mid to long run it's going to serve you well.
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...