Difficult but legally required by them, including establishing your bona fides.

How to trash your legacy.

It's about the latter but it doesn't have to work, just looks like you took action to solve a Daily Mail agenda..

Only the eye for an eye was the bible, the world goes blind was Ghandi.

This is the key, and it cuts in different ways and needs planning strategy.

If we don't go into town, then the businesses associated with going to work in town are in trouble, so coffee, lunch, snack, may as well get a book, after work drinks and then late food. All have less customers. Some of whom are themselves!

So a spiral of decline, less retail jobs in town, less secondary and tertiary employment "in town".

Theoretically we can now spend some of that money locally IF the local has the supply and this is where political strategy is needed to replan where we sleep as always where we spend our casual cash. And in many cases these dormitories are not well planned for that.

So unfortunately we need to wait out this next phase of resistance in order to build political consensus for zoning and planning for more sustainable local hubs.

Not disagreeing with the thrust that atheists can tend to push their views a bit but technically everyone is a bit of an atheist.

There are maybe 5000 gods currently being believed-in across the globe. A Christian doesn't believe in 4999 of them, an atheist doesn't believe in just one more.

Not actually true if we mean left as in ownership by the people and the right means ownership by capital.

Authoritarian or totalitarian are not the same as right.

We can condemn Hamas and Israel in the same breath. We don't have to support Israel as the agency to "remove" Hamas.

Too many bits of a smartphone are proprietary hardware without open drivers.

Gordons Jin?

I need this.

Is there a way to make that happen automatically? Like always be in reader mode.

Because the notes are in markdown, so are portable forever even if Obsidian went away.

A "plaster" in the uk

So how many frames is this, do we think, just for this clip...

I think this graph misses off a group struggling with ill health and pain in later life that say things like come on death, what are you waiting for. They are done, stuck in a long decline.

Actually that's over reaching what the judgement said. The SC said that the equalities act, as worded, needs the word female to mean biological in order to make sense. Not that trans women could not be women, just not with regards to way this specific act was worded if you were relying on it. Now parliament can review the act and see how differently to word it to accommodate both female at birth and trans women etc.

Well, not to diss on giving to charity but two technical arguments against. One is, you are acting as an additional tax on the worker (the source of the surplus) and then redirecting that tax to charity. It's fine but the elected government has democratically selected priorities that they can rarely fund so it is better to just give it to the treasury. And 2, just don't collect this tax in the first place, allowing the worker to spend it on the local economy.

Depends if they also evaporate.

Really? Like where are you thinking about?