@discuss.tchncs.de
I'm surprised no one mentioned ansible yet. It's meant for this (and more).
By ssh keys I assume you're talking about authorized_keys, not private keys. I agree with other posters that private keys should not be synced, just generate new ones and add them to the relevant servers authorized_keys with ansible.
Honestly, unless you can spend more $, one or two USB disks for the mini pc is probably your only choice.
I'm using organizr, it embeds your apps in tabs/iframes and allows you to configure them in the UI.
It depends on your usage. If you are downloading hundreds of GB per month or more, a block account does not make sense.
Personally I get almost everything off torrents, so I also have some Block accounts which last me many years for the occassional use.
Insurance is privatized with many providers, however the 'base insurance' covers the same at all providers and is mandatory to have for all residents. However base insurance prices still vary between providers every year, so people are encouraged to switch the provider regularily, which is a business on its own with brokers / call centers getting bonuses for every 'sign up', which means a lot of wasted money:
guys are not downloading enough 😅
User statistics
All-time upload: 143.678 TiB
All-time download: 112.403 TiB
All-time share ratio: 1.27
If this fits your budget (you still need the actuals disks..) it's not a bad choice. Speed should be sufficient for HDDs, as it's USB 3.
As the other poster suggested, don't use its hardware raid. Use it as a JBOD and configure the raid in Linux with ZFS or similar.
And never forget: RAID is not a backup! You still need to do regular backups, at least for important data.
no, its personal preference
Yeah the files are stored in blocks. It helps deduplicating and for syncing partial files/change. If your concern is just with being able to copy the files away, there is seaf-fuse, which lets you mount it as a local filesystem: https://manual.seafile.com/extension/fuse/
From your description I would gues that the affected trackers have some rate or connection limits, and your qbittorrent announces are exceeding them. try setting a higher announce interval, like 1+ hours
750gb upload, 5tb download per day. However this seems to be another limit, maybe file based max sharing or something.
same here, lol
If you only want online file storage and sync, you may want to try Seafile. It's a lot faster and has been rock solid since 10+ years for me. Not viable if you need some of the many nextcloud exentions though
It matters only if "the docker hosts external IP" your dns resolves is a public IP. In that case packets travel to the router which needs to map/send them back to the docker hosts LAN IP (NAT-Reflection). With cgnat this would need to be enabled on the carrier side, where you set up the port forwarding. If that's not possible, split-DNS may be an alternative.
If "the docker hosts external IP" is actually your docker hosts LAN IP, all of that is irrelevant. Split-DNS would accomplish that.
you need to improve your search skills:
thank you, just subsribed
I don't think you can force anything in this regard. There is the official forum, reddit and here. People will just naturally ask wherever they are comfortable.
I ran into the same problem some months ago when my cloud backups stopped being financially viable and I decided to recycle my old drives. For offline backups mergerfs will not work as far as I understand. Creating tar archives of 130TB+ also doesnt sound like a good option. Some of the tape backup solutions looked to be possible options, but are often complex and use special archive formats...
I ended up writing my own solution in python using json state files. It's complete enough to run the backup, but otherwise very work-in-progress with no restore at all. So I do not want to publish it.
If you find a suitable solution I am also very interested 😅
Are you hosting behind NAT / at home? If so, you may need to enable NAT reflection on your router.
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...