1. Because you're unable to read, there were 2 separate parts. Acknowledgement of historic harms requires teaching the reasoning that led to historic harms and explaining how and why they led to harms. Reparations reverse historic harms.
2. There's more than 1 minority in North America that has suffered historic harms.
3. Reparations come in many forms, including but not limited to money.

You only think it's dumb because you're a dumbass.

And that's why the reflecting pool was never painted pool-bottom blue, you fucking Orange

I imagine that despite the medicine being awesome, those ingredients don't taste all that great

I've been wondering why it's down, that's my home instance. That's unfortunate :/

Romans: not yet. First we need to bring you to Rome and march you through the streets as spoils of war before we can sacrifice you in front of the temple of Jupiter. But I promise that it isn't a religious thing

This was very clearly a war on Israel's behalf, not Russia

What about Super Vietnam and Ultimate Morocco?

Agender, neopronoun, and nonbinary identities

Always have. The longest held political prisoner is Leonard Peltier from the American Indian Movement who's been in prison since the 1970s. Alice Paul was a political prisoner who was tortured in prison in 1917 for trying to earn the right to vote.

That does help a bit, thank you. I thought that perhaps there was some dividing line that justified the different labels, however from what you're saying it seems the label is based purely on preference

And that's why I dropped Chemistry at the last minute my first semester

You're getting too caught up in the dictionary definition of hetero-. Yes I misspoke about what heterosexual means and was wrong about that, but that's not the core of my misunderstanding. I'm asking for resources pertaining to the differences between pansexuality and bisexuality. I want resources that dispell my previous notion that bisexuality is about sex whilst pansexuality is about gender.

My understanding is that bisexuals select all partners from both sexes and pansexuals select all partners from all genders

I haven't seen any evidence that it was a goal for this war. Current evidence shows that it was incidental and not intentional.

Your snarky comment about better understanding bisexuality and pansexuality does very little for my actual request for resources.

Do you have a resource to confirm what you're saying? Because homosexual means same sex and heterosexual is opposite sex. Bisexual would be both sexes by that reasoning

For those curious but don't want to bother opening the link:

• It was in North Carolina
• The engineer was critiquing NC infrastructure
• A NC agency said he needed a permit to criticize their infrastructure
• The judge correctly determined that it was a violation of our first amendment rights

Why the fuck are US citizens not allowed to vote in a US election?

I think this framing is extremely disingenuous in the title. It's the same kind of bullshit that resulted in the misframing of the McDonald's hot coffee suit.

And this clause will give unity some fun lawsuits for those old versions