My partner and I met on okcupid where one of the "match" questions is "Would you rather live in good times or interesting times?" Just about everyone (including him) answered "interesting times" and I had posted a little comment on it saying something along the lines of "I feel like people are not actually thinking through the implications of this."

Now whenever something "interesting" but shitty happens (see: the pandemic) I say, "remember when everyone on okcupid said they'd rather live through 'interesting' times...?" I'd prefer to just read about it in the history books.

For fuckin real. It's no wonder there is a never-ending stream of politicians and media personalities lined up to push these agendas even though they are patently insane.

Hot take. Would you really disagree that things have been fucked for the last 3+ years? Regarding "progress in general," at this point, it doesn't even feel like we're moving in the right direction in many ways unless you're a Christian billionaire.

a/s/l?

Yup, this is my biggest issue with Jerboa as well. Using the browser, it has a comment sort but it also has some scrolling bug that was making me unable to read headlines or click on posts haha.

Glad to see them saying as "thousands." Yesterday I saw a headline (can't remember where) that claimed "hundreds" which felt disingenuous, regardless of how you feel about the protest.

I'm currently viewing this post (plus plenty of other lemmy.ml posts) from lemmy.world just fine.

Lol dude. Plenty of people who speak English as a second language can speak (and write!) fluently and "naturally" with few errors.

This is confirmation bias. You assume anyone who writes a certain way online is a native speaker, but you have no way of actually knowing that unless they explicitly say so.

The humidity has been almost unbearable the past few days. We take our dog on 2 walks a day and it's been awful. Feel like I'm swimming in a bowl of soup.

While I agree with that definition of world news, I'm not sure the approach of siloing everything unless it hits a global threshold is the way to go, either. Personally, I appreciate seeing a smattering of events happening elsewhere, even if they're not necessarily globally important. It's an easy way to get exposure to things happening outside of my immediate bubble and I think it gives me a better global reference point generally. However, if "non-world news" were to be relegated to their respective local communities, I'm probably not going to attempt to go out and follow dozens of local communities just to see those stories; I will likely just miss out on those perspectives entirely and I doubt I'm the only one.

I was responding to your claim that you can "usually" tell when English isn't someone's first language. You can't. Unless every comment also states whether English is their native language, there's no way you can know this. It's likely there are a ton of people who aren't native speakers that you don't detect because they write well enough. Plenty of people are fluent in a second language.

Apparently they were hit pretty bad in the pandhandle. Just got a breaking news alert that said 3 dead, 100 injured.

The storm pretty much missed my corner of dfw entirely. Had about 5 mins of rain.

It's there but it seems kinda buggy (or maybe I haven't quite figured it out yet? Lol.) Long press in the blank space to the right of the username and a hidden menu should pop up underneath their comment. The link icon will take you back to your parent comment with replies. Definitely would be nice if it were more apparent, though. I only found it because I refused to believe that function didn't exist and spent like 5 mins just randomly poking at my screen.

Damn, I just assumed they were screening to ensure real users acting in good faith. Didn't expect them to actually be rejecting people.