Well answered in your duplicate post https://nord.pub/...

For an LLM comparison, this is what I get from haiku

sudo is older, more complex, and feature-rich, while doas is newer, simpler, and security-focused.

Core distinctions:

Code size & complexity: doas has roughly 700 lines of code versus sudo's 100,000+ lines, making doas easier to audit and maintain.

Configuration: sudo uses the complex sudoers file with intricate syntax; doas uses a simpler doas.conf file that's more straightforward to read and write.

Security philosophy: doas was designed with security-first principles, minimizing potential attack surface. sudo accumulated features over decades, increasing complexity and potential vulnerabilities.

Feature set: sudo has advanced features like session recording, plugins, authentication caching, and detailed logging. doas is minimalist—it handles the essential privilege escalation task without extras.

Adoption: sudo is ubiquitous across Linux and Unix systems. doas is less common but gaining traction, particularly on OpenBSD (where it originated) and among security-conscious users.

Performance: doas is faster and lighter, while sudo carries more overhead.

In practice, doas works well for straightforward privilege escalation needs, while sudo is better if you need advanced features or broader compatibility.

Is it chlorinated? Peroxide would break down the chloramine

I thought turtles were fast AF

Tortoises are slow

Lol and the drawing is of a tortoise

Literally, there's an incredible amount of footage from Iran where the vast majority of women aren't wearing anything of the sort. Do just high profile people get targeted?

The US govt took the data, did they ever release any of it? I have read they claim it's "of little use", and if true should be fine to release after all this time

That's a good point, bit like the UK with social media posts

When I cook meat, eggs or with ginger for people who don't like them, they're usually converted. Turns out most people who don't like steaks, ribs, roasts, etc just haven't had good ones

Both are true, I'm not sure I'd call it "millions per month" though...

Usage has been slowly dropping year on year since 2022 but also this year usage is up

In Sydney, Australia we have fully automated subway with no drivers in them, called the metro

I didn't realise I had to be politically correct about cannibalism

So because you talk to people sometimes, there's nothing AI can assist on? That doesn't really make any sense

https://aitoolsrecap.com/...

An article about companies forgetting to set budgets? Wow that trumps the claim that correct application of AI is more productive and cost effective than human work

Why the fuck would you give it full unfettered access to your production system?

You're not allowed to use homo as an insult though, only hetero

100%

https://www.economist.com/...

https://www.forbes.com/...

https://techcrunch.com/...

https://www.risingtrends.co/...

It is very much being called the SaaS apocalypse...

Where are AI subscriptions subsidised for enterprise use? Github copilot was the last to drop the subsidised model for big business at the start of the month as far as I can tell. Only individuals and very small businesses are getting subsidised subscriptions now, and it's still super economical and cost efficient to use even frontier models at API billing rates compared to humans. A human can work all day on debugging a software defect, or Opus can find the root cause in ten minutes for $20. Sure that still needs reviewing but that's insane productivity AND cost improvement

I can see it's driving down costs, I work in industry. Lots of competitors have popped up with AI apps with lower prices. There's a reason it's called the SaaS apocalypse

For Anthropic at least, your usage is broken up into five hour windows. During peak periods the usage is burnt in like 1/3 of the time compared to off-peak. You can do heaps, like build large sophisticated applications with 100% agentic workflows, if you spread your usage out over your five hour windows and especially if you use it mostly in the off peak.

On pro, your five hour usage is basically one solid feature developed or one big refactor/cleanup with opus 4.8 with some room left over for reviews, planning and a little mistake. 5x and 10x plans are more in the price range you mention, so multiply that as such. Or you'd get a combination of general purpose daily usage, and development usage.

There's also a weekly cap but I haven't hit it.

Fable, aka locked down mythos, when it was available on pro could complete my entire todo list for the day in half an hour at astounding quality while simplifying everything it touches, finding and fixing preexisting vulnerabilities in code review and finishing with 98% of the five hour quota used off-peak

I don't think most hobbyists would use more than a quarter of a pro plan due to the five hour lockout mechanism

Interesting how it's driving up hardware costs and driving down software costs

You can sharpen scissors too...