we

Don't involve me in this, I don't contribute to society at all!

We’re trying to build communities. A good way to do it is to have bots post content, so there’s stuff to see on our feeds.

There's always ups and downs with everything. By using bots you might get subscribers, but people like me who don't agree with being force fed robot spam will actively avoid such subs.

In fact I find it so disagreeable I refuse to donate resources so people can host spam on my instance instead of actually posting content themselves.

I would not like to be part of a community that finds auto-generated content to be of an acceptable quality.

Do you think the oath swearing lends credibility to the statements?

Don't be too hard on yourself, if you recognized you got fooled (like so many others) you're already better prepared to not get fooled by something similar again.

Thanks, very handy!

Just a patent for a UFO made back in the 2000's by a US Navy guy, along with patents for zero-point energy and anti-gravity drives.

https://archive.org/details/US20060145019A1

Do I even need to post "Reese Witherspoon / Reese Withoutherspoon" for people to see the image?

Would you consider the leaked panama- and paradise papers as examples of a giant, openly known but seldomly proven conspiracy?

... Are you the "some" in "Some people claim..."?

I think there will be some testimonies by unsignificant people that can't lead to any definitive conclusions. I'll happily be proven wrong, we'll see tomorrow and in the times ahead.

Is there any way to find out what sort of evidence he's volunteered to present in a SCIF? From what I understood (not native English speaker) there were certain confirmations he'd only be willing to make in a secure location, but I didn't catch any mentions of actual evidence.

To me it seems the statements he's only willing to make in a SCIF was of the "Yes I can confirm that we have alien bodies." type. That's kinda already implicit.

Bob Laser

I don’t have anything that would satisfy you in regards to this.

I respect your approach to our different standards. Only hindsight can tell us who had the best tools for working towards the same goals.

From my understanding there was roughly 11 hours of closed door hearings with congressional lawyers. The issue was getting people in the room with the right clearances to view the evidence. Again, reported on by the same journalists.

While I understand that journalists must protect their sources, there's also the issue of "Just trust me bro". In these grey areas I tend to view cases on the basis of lowest common denominator and in layers of confidence: I don't see how closed door hearings necessarily mean presenting evidence, just that (at least) the topics and claims being discussed potentially have an impact on US national security? Of course this doesn't exclude any presentation of evidence, up to and including marching out a genuine grey alien.

So I know it's potentially some very serious stuff, I have reason to believe the validity of Grusch' claims, it is possible evidence have been presented behind closed door and it is within the realm of possibility that this is the start of a partial and controlled disclosure and I cannot exclude that it straight up is the beginning of Disclosure.

With so many different claims in the UFO/UAP field, how do you find people you trust and find credible? I'm partial to Richard Dolan, as a UFO historian he has an academic approach - I can check his credible claims for myself in publicly available sources and after doing this enough times I have found I trust his information despite not always agreeing with his conclusion.

I’m also interested in the 2019 IG statement

After closer examination it seems the date is wrong. It is July 2021 and regarding "Confidentially provided classified information to the Department of Defense Inspector General concerning the withholding of UAP-related information from Congress." which seems more like actually blowing the whistle rather than complaining about the treatment he got as a whistleblower, described as "a whistleblower reprisal investigation" in the timeline overview linked below.

https://www.papooselake.org/david-grusch-timeline

You are Mark Hopper, the average teenager, who becomes an RGB agent and the agency's salvation.

I guess I had an unusual youth, I was never recruited as a secret agent.

Game looks fun, thanks for sharing.

My favourite part was when they went "ack ack".

Ventablack humor gets me through the day.

I don't think I even need to click this to know what it is.

Edit: I clicked it and it was exactly what I thought.

It's a badly crafted cover up, obvious to those with the slightest ability to investigate or resonate. So another successful psyop.

Well, he doesn't act crazy, nor does he present what I see as crazy claims so I'm comfortable to exclude "crazy" from the list.

Still it feels like not enough people here is open to the possibility of Grusch being fed lies and believing it himself, or even that the entire thing being a limited hangout.

Got inspired and found these, but having one single map with everything would be great indeed!

• https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1i1RWNKFHTusSEdRcVpj-XkJKapQ&ll
• https://www.touristlink.com/...
• https://www.historic-uk.com/...
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_castles