All-natural human failure, fresh from 2018 for for your enjoyment:

https://www.boredpanda.com/worst-photoshop-fails/

Getting 75% of my daily fiber at breakfast and then another 75% of my daily fiber just from eating normally the rest of the day sounds like a lot. I can only see this being a good thing in like a food desert or medical situation where vegetables aren't an option.

Thanks!

(I don't know what "shake" means in this context.)

I think this topic is really a bit much for me right now, but I do want to say that your use of the term "MAP" has me questioning your motives. I associate it with people making pride flags and trying to legitimize child abuse. I do have sympathy for people afflicted with pedophilia, however, and I would like for stigma surrounding the disorder to decrease so that sufferers can seek help and set boundaries more freely. Could you please defend use of the term? I don't want to be close-minded about it.

In order for generative AI to produce a realistic image of a naked child it has to be taught what naked children look like. Real children were abused to train the AI.

We already have humans who can draw CSAM without any actual victims, and the reason for banning such material is that it may encourage future child abuse, which is a very realistic and reasonable concern in my opinion. It's possible that fictitious child abuse may have value in providing an outlet for those suffering from pedophilia, but I personally think that it should be regulated in accordance with the opinions mental health professionals and not left up to the concept of free speech.

Regarding the comparison to objections made against homosexuality, we have to look at what is meant by harm to society. In the case of CSAM it's that real children may be harmed. In the case of gay media it's that more people might be openly gay. These are both plausible outcomes, but the levels of harm are very different. It's fine to risk more people being gay because it doesn't hurt anything; it's not fine to risk children being harmed.

PSA for the people who apparently need it: When a vagina is happy it drools a lot. One does not usually pee the bed while masturbating, though the option is available.

I really think we need different words for these things. In my own experience, consenting to sexual contact with over 18's as a teenager was a neutral-to-positive experience for me, while being assaulted by under 18's was not hella fun. I don't really like that they're bundled together as the same thing.

No, not that kind of toning. Sara's toning the fish in the sea.

"It’s easier for women to detect the 'cunning' kind of cuteness in female characters, whereas men would probably go What’s the difference? (laughs)

女性キャラの“あざとさ”は、同じ女性が見たほうが気付きやすく、男の人だと「何が違うの？」となる部分でも見抜けるんです。ディアナ警察はみんな、女性スタッフだったはずです。（笑）

I had absolutely no idea what he was talking about until I dug into the term あざとさ. I'm not qualified to tell anyone about it, but my summarized understanding is that it's using charisma and/or vulnerability in a manipulative way, but not necessarily to control or cause harm. The idea is to get other people to feel positively about you, and whether you abuse that to farm unreturned favors is another story. It's something children do instinctively, so it makes sense it's an element they'd focus on in portraying a small child.

Here is one of the pages where I read about it:

https://wedding.mynavi.jp/us/article/73143/

I really like the Firefox translation:

A bruising technique that makes people you like cum

YouTube added a "feature" like that, where it generates thumbnails for your video. It's at least obvious that that's what it's doing, but people don't seem to like seeing realistic AI-generated images of themselves for some reason.

Police navidad.

My ears being pierced doesn't harm me physically, but it does remind me that I used to be someone's property and that I could be again. I think "it would look cute" is not a valid reason to violate someone's bodily autonomy.

You can choose to play third-person if you really want.

Yes, I frequently learn things from the replies to comments which have been removed by a moderator. I also like to look up the posts themselves to learn what was objectionable.

That's like saying brushing your teeth takes time away from sleeping. You're supposed to plan ahead, especially because having established bedtime rituals helps you fall asleep.

Yes, if the overall sentiment is that people don't like what I have to say then my thought is generally that I ought not have said it. Sometimes I might think that it's others who are being close-minded or whatever, but I usually feel terrible for having caused offense, and I then wish to erase my mistake.

I think the idea is that the man inadvertantly alerts his wife to his "I don't know how to use this incredibly simple machine" grift. I think they call it malicious incompetence?

Yay! :3

Europe is mostly an endless sea of knolls with quaint windmills and no internet access.