"Put our troops in danger" while they bomb the shit out of Yemen.

I agree that they are facists but they seem to have an incredible focus on Hitler and Nazism imported from Nazi Germany.

Yep exactly. The US attacks on Yemen are just a continuation of a long American tradition of bombing the shit out of "lesser" nations.

Why treat Proton like it's the work of a single person rather than a large team?

But Israel has been killing Palestinians long before Hamas... would the attacks in the West Bank stop? I don't think so.

But there is nothing to guarantee that... and Palestinians will still be oppressed by Israel. Right?

That's, ironically, how the white supremacists felt all these years lol

You equate all Palestinians with Hamas then?

@JustZ@lemmy.world what do you think of this?

Pretty clear to me that they do want this in a way. Leaving the poor to die and suffer strikes me as very "genocide of the underclass"

I think you do sound like a Zionist... a few hundred casualties within a few days and everyone is sick and all hospitals are destroyed. Sounds like a genocide attempt to me.

You mean they are providing organ donations more than any other car. Silver lining. /s

Ah yes of course it's because we can't spell the word, not because of the rhetoric directly borrowed from Nazis.

Incel Inside.

is not normal and is not what any Democratic President would be doing.

And yet it's what happened under them.....

The stuff you just quoted sounds pretty straightforward. Israel is withholding necessary aid from innocent people with no date to turn it back on. If Gazan needs hundreds of aid trucks a day, does it matter how much they were able to store? The storages would not last more than a week. It has been WEEKS!! Also I read that Israel caused destruction or power outages to the water purification facilites... how do you explain that? You can't.

I wonder what kind of "republican" changes to Proton would be possible to put forth without angering the majority of users or defeating the point of Proton altogether. That's why I don't see this as a prelude to anything major. What do you think?

I've had, hands down, one of the worst project managers in the world. Hewas overly concerned with team politics and toxicly positive. His toxic positivity was the main reason in my opinion as to why we never delivered anything usable to the company and were eventually downsized. He had no vision at all for quick and frequent delivery... he was the wrong person for the job but consistently believed that he just needed to "do his best for the day" and sleep happy that night. Meanwhile, his team was boiling with frustration and wasted work hours for features requested by management on a whim — these usually end up fully forgotten by the time they are production ready. His biggest accomplishment is somewhat shielding his team from upper management... sometimes. He was such a bottle neck and our team was a net loss to the company except where they could advertise "using AI" in their products. If he had been removed, and we (his team) had to manage things ourselves with the stakeholders, we would have probably been able to deliver something worthwhile every quarter or so.

Okay but think about it... they may just have well written texts that they readily share. It doesn't really comment on the quality of the evidence if someone copy paste it a lot. Isn't it better to read any new text and assess its credibility yourself instead of pre-discarding it by judging the person?

So you don't mean neighbouring countries.