Near as I can tell, there are certain communities that have a "rule" that every time you browse that community, you must post something before you leave. This leads to a lot of low effort shitposting that I guess some people find fun but I just blocked those communities so my /All feed wasn't cluttered.

I find this very disappointing, not because I'm hugely attached to Beehaw (although their large gaming community has dominated my feed this week). But rather because the first response to whatever adversity they were facing, real or perceived, is to take the nuclear option. The biggest drawback to Lemmy as opposed to Reddit is the over fragmentation and the lack of quality content, so intentionally increasing those challenges feels short-sighted and bad for the ecosystem as a whole.

As yet another former Redditor trying to make sense of the decentralized model, there is something very comforting knowing "sh.itjust.works". Thanks for doing this.

I don't love this example because enjoyment of the object isn't really a cost. If I buy a book or a videogame or a movie, the time it takes to enjoy the media is the value, not the cost.

If you're talking about maintenance and upkeep on your car, that is a different type of cost that has to be weighed against the cost and time expenditure of a bus pass or whatever your alternative was.

In other words I feel like this is a catchy phrase that kind of falls apart once you start to dig at it.

Like a lot of new users I'm only here because Reddit killed the app I used. I don't like the official Reddit app. But if I'm honest, it's still a better experience than Lemmy right now. You can't deny that Lemmy has less content and more warts.

Like any early adopter, I'm here for the potential. For what I hope this can one day become. That's not something a majority of people care about. If/when Lemmy reaches parity for "normal" users, attitudes will change quickly.

I agree with the spirit of this 100% and will support any way I can. I only hope the implementation is free of trolls, bots, and other bad actors.

Ok so help me understand here. The root post is Beehaw complaining that their four admins can't handle the new influx of users. But isn't that the entire point of moderators? Shouldn't each community be responsible for dealing with trolls, etc? From what I've seen of Beehaw, they're attempting to have the same handful of admins moderate every single community, which was never going to be sustainable and IMHO misses the entire point of this sort of experience.

Not what you're asking, but it took me the longest time to figure out that you can set your default home page to your subscribed communities instead of whatever is more-or-less-randomly hosted on sh.itjust.works. (It's the "Type" setting in your user profile). Hopefully this helps anyone who stumbles on this.

You can search for existing communities using the community browser.

I'm not even certain what all "Datahording" entails but !datahoarder@lemmy.ml appears to be one such community.

I feel like there's a lot more to this than "pay it twice". If you're talking purely in dollars, then you'll want to consider maintenance and upkeep over the expected lifetime of the object and compare that to alternatives. Additionally, everything has an opportunity cost because no resource is limitless and you could have allocated it elsewhere. Finally, emotional and other intangible benefits are something that most people have a very difficult time quantifying.

If you want to say "consider more than just the purchase price" then I'm with you.

Just a heads up that with their loosely moderated contributor model, you can find anything on Forbes these days. Up to and including outright scams and misinformation. It's a far cry from the reputable source it once was.

One article of many.

I naively want to believe that this won't be an issue for most users having most conversations. But out of curiosity can you link what the ban list actually contains?

I prefer when areas are designed to be handled by higher level characters rather than always scaling with the player like Skyrim does. My ideal is when said scaling is somewhat subtle like in Elden Ring - there's an intended route, but if you go somewhat out of order it's not the end of the world and player skill matters more than a few levels anyway. I guess we'll see how much level matters in this universe.

And who decides what counts as bad behavior worth forfeiting funds? Sounds ripe for corruption.

This is hugely personal to your own interests. Personally I am subscribed to communities around news, science, gaming, whiskey, and my favorite sports team. You can always use the community browser to look for something specific or just keep an eye on the "all" listing to see if something catches your eye.

The way I see it - does the game have a final boss? Or a difficult climactic ending sequence? A meaningful resolution? Then I did the part that matters, and feel fine saying I beat the game. The side quests and collectible junk usually is just busy work that wouldn't pose a challenge, I just don't have the time or interest.

• The Whisky Exchange: The classic shop, shipping to the US is rough though
• Whisky Shop USA: Based in California, website is rough but has some hard to find stuff
• Wine Searcher: For the really hard to find stuff
• Whisky Auctioneer and Whisky Hammer: For when you're such a degenerate that you don't shop retail anymore
• Whiskybase: To keep track of your inventory and its value

I think it depends on your opinion of what was "wrong" with Cyberpunk to begin with. If your issue was the bugs, it's a lot more stable now. If your issue was that the story was unengaging and player actions lacked weight and consequence, adding more of the same isn't going to do much good.

Much like your No Man's Sky example - if you thought the core gameplay loop was lacking before, you probably haven't changed your mind no matter how many little goodies the devs have added since launch.

I know basically nothing about this game but I'm completely burned out on the Ubisoft open world model of a huge map completely littered with mindless collectible junk and grindy side-quests. Is there reason to hope that this will be different than the same junk Assassin's Creed and Far Cry have been pushing out, or are most expecting the same thing in a Star Wars setting?

Is this community interested in review posts? The Bear Face Triple Oak recently blew me away, especially at the ~$35 price point.