Amazon hoped the unit would one day generate a profit by users spending more money somehow

anybody that's used an alexa for more than about 5 minutes should have noticed that pretty much everything it can do that's more complicated than setting a timer to tell you when your chicken nuggets are done is designed to push you into the amazon services ecosystem

amazon spent a lot of money on trying to do this and then found out the technology doesn't exist and outsourced it to india

felon tells ex-prosecutor that it's time for law and order

what?

no thank you give me the measurement in weight so i can have a digital read on it and not have to use my disgusting human eyeball to estimate

also so that i don't have to re-wash and dry my one measuring spoon 5 times

"wet bulb" isn't a term that's eerie and unsettling to anyone else?

i don't do time well it's not my fault

all these fascists who are against...

*checks notes*

...funding genocide?

i'm sorry but if you were enough of a rube to sign up for a $2/mo subscription for that then this might be darwinistic capitalism

you had the opportunity to buy the winning lottery numbers last week and you BLEW IT

me irl but ich im echten leben

i mean there aren't any pro-fascism comments here at time of me posting this so maybe this thread isn't the resource you think it is

nobody in this thread is pretending harris is more pro-genocide than trump

i have literally never seen a comment on the fediverse that implied that

the us just spent a lot of money picking a new assault rifle specifically because they wanted one that could actually penetrate kevlar now that russia and china are issuing it to their troops

well, i guess maybe china is issuing it to their troops

if true were on the other side he'd have killed by now

You're drawing some pretty premature conclusions from incomplete information.

i mean yeah i did but i don't see how that relates to harris being more pro-genocide than trump

if i had to guess, to convey the idea that "i do not like it when presidential candidates support the funding of genocide"

but then again asking me to divine the will of a poster i've never met or spoken to is quite a strange thing to do

2022 aqa paper 1 if anybody's wondering what the subject entails (and to check your work)

you too?

STILL wearing the bandage?