Biology coder, DSci, etc.
@lemmy.ml
Biology coder, DSci, etc.
Your argument and vitriole is a nice example of weaponized self-righteousness. You think because you're aware of a class of people that has a disadvantage in labor, that makes your opinion on that group more valuable than others, and instead of having the conversation about labor or why some men fall prey to bullshit, because of vitriole like this that serves only to alienate, you're playing right into the hands of people who divide labor and reap profits.
Instead of stating anything at all respectfully and with a level head, you're shoving things down someone's throat (LMAO) for having something to say about what misogyny is to a group of people (some men) that understand where misogyny comes from, how young men internalize misogyny and then go into management to perpetuate it, and how's it's used in terms of capital markets to sell vibes to people (men and women) that feel attacked by a real issue.
People like you are a dime a dozen.
If it's radioactive, that's because of a fundamental assumptive imbalance in the contract between the author, the community, the users, the stakeholders, and the parasitic lawyers and their overlords.
If they don't like it, pay/license and/or contribute.
But it's icky because the issue of remuneration for legacy actors remains the unspoken part here. Actors train for their whole lives and these models have the potential to undermine the value of these actors.
"don't do evil"
Thanks for cross posting.
Dear Jeff,
love your channel.
I think the biggest gift of Jeff's channel and others like it in the DiY space outshines far above corporate darlings like LMG and others. The reason I think this about Jeff's channel is that it is a gift of education on how to relay opinions, media, and data ownership in a world dominated by EULAs and advertising.
What Google and Tech don't understand is that the content created on those platforms truly isn't theirs. It may be monetized on those platforms, but the second they start doing things, like feeding digests of political content and reactions to subvert the people and their free speech, the platform becomes part of the digital handcuffs, the "free as in beer" solution that subverts the conversations and the people.
Moreso than LMG or anyone else adjacent in the tech YouTube space, Jeff's bright smile and your good attitude brings something to the table that these corporations can't comprehend the value behind: freedom from popularity contents. Freedom from censorship and platform lock-in.
Thanks.
Regardless of the lipid accumulation, they didn't comment at all in the arstechnica piece about how the energetics are different 2ATP per COH3- in McG vs 1.5 ATP per COH3- in Calvin and where the glycolate is coming from. The whole point was to comment on RUBISCO inefficiency which they did not do, and the McG pathway consumes more ATP per carbon fixed, which is kind of against the idea of fixing more carbon in the first place. I'm not sure how truly amazing this article is, given the energetics, the lack of comment on stoich comparisons, and the glaring error of not commenting at all about the source of the glycolate.
I don't trust us with a nuclear weapon with someone like him in office.
We're the ones that used one.
The anti-finance comment is just him being an insecure trash human because he can't find the words to assure the public (which would be a lie) but at least the nice thing to say.
So, we don't expect the nice thing from him. He thinks it's cool to be "whatever" about the topic, because he's thinking about whoever bought and sold him on the war and the assassination of the ayatolah...
wtf timeline are we in...
You can save tons of time by adding aliases to your .gitconfig such as 'ga $fname' (where "fname" would be files you want to add) the alias for git add. You can also do the same thing with gc, gs, etc and if youre like me and you write dozens of lines of code a day, it can save you a lot of time.
Will checkout your repos. Thanks for comment. It's been a breeze to write python and the docstrings are pretty great. I've had periods where everything just worked for Sphinx autodoc and then others where it's just broken for months. Thanks again
Would seriously love someone to rip down Sphinxdoc and put this baby to bed.
In my history of using docstrings, I've put maybe 20-40minutes of docs into a 200k+ codebase. It's super easy.
In my history of using Sphinx autodoc, I've spent about 5-10 hours fumbling with Makefiles, configs, and other nightmares and it still has the worst developer experience after about 8 years of using it.
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...