I wish more guys just said they didn't know something instead of clearly not knowing what they're talking about and running their mouth based on vibes

25% of reddit comments are chatgpt trash if not worse. It used to be an excellent Open Source Intelligence tool but now it's just a bunch of fake supportive and/or politically biased bots

I will miss reddits extremely niche communities, but I believe Lemmy has reached the inflection point to eventually reach the same level of niche communities

Is this a meme? Shouldn't it be

( + 2 ( * 5 ( - 8 5 ) ) )

Fake. My parents didn't have a stable marriage

Edit: Please read second paragraph

At least with where AI is now, it's basically an incredible data compressor. My local copy of gemm4:31b takes up less than 50GB iirc, and I can retrieve information from the entire Internet with it without an internet connection.

Using an AI to train an AI is like taking a jpg of a jpg. You're going to lose information eventually. Hallucinations will become worse like in a game of telephone

You're right, we need water fountains with milk instead

Be careful if you download this game your computer will blow up if you make your character trans by swapping them for witch or wizard

Dude, man, bro, and "fellas" have all become gender neutral to me

Edit: come to think of it not only has "bro" become neutral, but "bro-sephanie" has become something I use for guys.

Laplacian Edge detection? beautiful meme

Russia (allegedly) has elections too however

Don't tell him, if too many people get ad blockers they're just going to keep evolving

Meanwhile: NixOS

Wouldn't it make more sense to kill him instead of just yourself? Strictly hypothetically speaking

Unfortunately, it's for the best. If you're serious about research you have to present yourself. Especially if you're the first person to discover it, you're the most - possibly only - qualified person to talk about that thing.

Part of scientific communication is giving elevator talks. You have to be able to argue for funding.

Not to mention, if you never develop those skills, you're just opening yourself up to getting a worse financial incentive for the same amount of work

Oml I thought it was Clowns don't doesn't even phase [me]

Better yet, name Canada North Mexico

Great comment, took me back to computer architecture. Not sure I can answer. Just a postulate, is it because the electric forces are a billion times stronger than gravity so they both neutralize quicker, but also can more reliably and precisely cause electricity to flow because when you do disturb that balance, it's much stronger than the interactions with massive systems we're used to visualizing?

That, as well as how computers will run the same computation multiple times and select output bits by majority rules to correct errors from say cosmic rays causing some bits to flip part way through one (but not all) of the fault tolerant circuits?

Ollama (+ web-ui but ollama serve & && ollama run is all you need) then compare and contrast the various models

I've had luck with Mistral for example

PCM?

I sort of agree, but I think it depends on effort.

Type one word in and try and sell the easiest generated image? Low value.

But typing the right combo to create assets to create something larger than the model is capable of? That's more valuable.

Criticizing AI or artists that leverage AI is like criticizing an artist for using a printer instead of drawing by hand

Or saying someone's digital work is inferior because they used a tool to help make their image...

On that note, when working on a large project, is an AI artist as pretentious as the artist in the comic because they got some help generating the project from an AI instead of another human? Or is someone's work ethic less credible for Google searching instead of asking a person? Are works of art valuable because they're entirely original and uninfluenced by anything else but the artist themself? Because with that metric no artists are valuable since nothing is entirely original anyways