Utah invokes sovereignty to ignore Biden admin’s Title IX transgender protections

2 years ago by jeffw to c/news

During a special legislative session, lawmakers approved two resolutions that could jeopardize federal education funding.
Veraxus 67 points 2 years ago

Misquoting the Constitution in a transparent attempt at justifying Constitutional violations?

Why does this sound familiar?

path: 0 10747947, hotness: undefined, score: 67, children: 3
baldingpudenda 25 points 2 years ago

path: 0 10747947 10751351, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 1
afraid_of_zombies 4 points 2 years ago

God damn it. Stop summoning the Sherman. Last time someone did that everyone caught on fire.

path: 0 10747947 10751351 10762857, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
newthrowaway20 9 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I feel like I learned about this a long time ago and it didn't end well.

path: 0 10747947 10752121, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
FlyingSquid 49 points 2 years ago

The "Utah Sovereignty Act," which went into effect this year, is what they claim allows them to do this.

The Legislature may, by concurrent resolution, prohibit a government officer from enforcing or assisting in the enforcement of a federal directive within the state if the Legislature determines the federal directive violates the principles of state sovereignty

Which... why even have a U.S. at that point? Just secede if you feel that way.

path: 0 10752541, hotness: undefined, score: 49, children: 3
nomous 19 points 2 years ago

Just secede if you feel that way

The land doesn't even belong to them. Between the Bureau of Land Management, National Forests, Parks, National Monuments, National Recreation and Wilderness Areas the federal government owns over 70% of Utah.

path: 0 10752541 10762042, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 2
zer0squar3d 3 points 2 years ago

Guess it's time to evict them eh?

path: 0 10752541 10762042 10783005, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
nomous 2 points 2 years ago

"If they don't like it here they can get out" or something.

path: 0 10752541 10762042 10783005 10785489, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
NateNate60 32 points 2 years ago path: 0 10749719, hotness: undefined, score: 32, children: 1
ResoluteCatnap 5 points 2 years ago

Whoa whoa whoa, bringing history into this? What are we supposed to study and learn from that stuff instead of studying some book a polygamist pedophile wrote?

path: 0 10749719 10755872, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
conquer4 29 points 2 years ago

Simple, hold all federal spending for the state. Start moving all federal jobs out of the state, start a BRAC to close all military bases in the state.

path: 0 10755676, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 1
riskable 4 points 2 years ago

Nah just declare that churches worth over $1 billion that are influencing politics are no longer churches and therefore no longer tax exempt. Utah will change their tune immediately.

path: 0 10755676 10777208, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
VoteNixon2016 19 points 2 years ago

I'm not shocked they're doing it, I'm just shocked they didn't use it to bring back polygamy too

path: 0 10754960, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 9
ResoluteCatnap 12 points 2 years ago

They don't need to bring it back---Polygamy is still in the Mormon church. They believe in eternal marriages and after a civil (normal) divorce they won't let women remarry but men can marry again in the church. Same thing if your spouse dies.

Mormons expecting to go to heaven and meet all their wives up there.

path: 0 10754960 10755841, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1
afraid_of_zombies 5 points 2 years ago

Mormons expecting to go to heaven and meet all their wives up there.

That could be very awkward. Sounds like a sitcom idea that runs for 9 seasons yet no one remembers watching more than one episode.

path: 0 10754960 10755841 10762823, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
jeffw 5 points 2 years ago

Bring… back?

path: 0 10754960 10760461, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 6
Xatolos 5 points 2 years ago
path: 0 10754960 10760461 10762341, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
jeffw 3 points 2 years ago

TIL illegal things don’t happen

path: 0 10754960 10760461 10762341 10762423, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
VoteNixon2016 1 point 2 years ago

Mormons in Utah (a territory at the time) practiced polygamy, but the federal government made ending it a requirement for statehood. So since we're just ignoring federal laws now...

path: 0 10754960 10760461 10761234, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
jeffw 0 points 2 years ago

Still confused. Practiced?

path: 0 10754960 10760461 10761234 10762424, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 2
VoteNixon2016 0 points 2 years ago

Polygamous marriage was a religious rite in Mormonism, presented as a requirement to get into the best part of Mormon heaven (as an aside, Mormonism divides heaven into 3 main tiers, ranging from "totally cut off from God and everyone you ever loved but still better than life on Earth" to "you get to be God". And this is a simplification since the theology is wild). So when I say "practiced", it's just the usual terminology for when religious people do something dictated by their religion.

Technically, Mormon church leadership has disavowed polygamy, but like other people commented, they still teach that men can have multiple wives in the afterlife, and the current leader of the Mormon church has an... [interesting marriage at the moment (his second wife, so he fully expects 2+ wives after he dies.)] (https://mormondisclosures.blogspot.com/...). The exmormon subreddit has more discussion about this, if you're willing to visit Reddit.

path: 0 10754960 10760461 10761234 10762424 10798012, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
Ultraviolet 12 points 2 years ago

Utah receives a lot of money from the federal government, totaling almost a third of their entire state budget. I guess they don't want it anymore?

path: 0 10762670, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
PriorityMotif 12 points 2 years ago
path: 0 10754140, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
BigMacHole 9 points 2 years ago

I'm so tired of this! I've been asking someone DESPERATELY to Shoot up a room full of 6 year olds so I can FINALLY Pretend to care about the Constitution again!

path: 0 10765668, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
some_guy 3 points 2 years ago

Try fighting a civil war now, red states. See how far you get against contemporary weapons.

path: 0 10765004, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
bradorsomething 5 points 2 years ago

Everyone who clamors for war has never experienced one. We’ve had peace for so long they don’t know what war means.

path: 0 10765004 10778913, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
some_guy 1 point 2 years ago

I don't clamor for war. Quite the opposite. I merely pointed out that the desire of accelerationists for civil war is poorly considered when faced with the reality of the USA's contemporary armed forces in my own sarcastic way.

path: 0 10765004 10778913 10815135, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
news
news

@lemmy.world

login for more options
39528
40322
9854

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

go to feed...