Should it really be Telegram?

3 years ago by Provider to c/privacyguides

In recent years, WhatsApp has become one of the most popular messaging apps worldwide, connecting billions of people across the globe. However, beneat

Is Telegram really that bad and should i look more into it or is sticking to signal really the best option?

Melody 28 points 3 years ago

Telegram is legitimately bad, it's only saving grace being that it is STILL BETTER THAN DISCORD! It's main "Sin" is rolling it's own Encryption Algorithm; which has been proven to be less than 100% airtight and secure.

Sadly your average user does not care about privacy above all else. They only care about privacy in as much as it can factually and emotionally affect their daily lives. TL;DR: You have to incentivize them to care, and they will often refuse to move, or outright dislike a platform, if a specific feature they love or depend on doesn't exist, even when it is 100% not critical to the application's function.

path: 0 1431066, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 1
dngray 1 point 3 years ago

which has been proven to be less than 100% airtight and secure.

I don't believe that has been proven. There has been criticism of it 1, 2 from prominent cryptographers though.

Telegram's MTProto protocol isn't obviously broken in a practical way, concedes Matt Green, a cryptographer at Johns Hopkins University who has consulted for Facebook on encrypted messaging systems. But it's uniquely "weird," he says, in a way that suggests its inventors don't understand tried-and-true cryptography practices and raises his suspicions that it may yet have undiscovered vulnerabilities.

Their response was even more dodgy trying to somehow inject some sort of "nationalistic", "america bad" into it:

Telegram's Ravdonikas argues that “Telegram encryption relies on classical algorithms, because we consider some approaches promoted by US-based cryptographers after 9-11/the Patriot Act (which your sources refer to as 'state of the art cryptography') questionable."

At the end of the day math is math regardless where it comes from. Secret chats also only work with the mobile client, have to be manually turned on and do not work for group chats and as it's a centralized server you can't host your own.

And with RFC 9420 aka Messaging Layer Security (MLS) being standardized, it's likely all the good messengers will use that.

path: 0 1431066 1618479, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
eruchitanda 22 points 3 years ago

Signal considered the best between those 3 apps.

  • Signal have E2EE. Facebook decided to copy the idea to Whatsapp. AFAIK, attackers have always gained access only by other methods.
  • Telegram created their own protocol, MTProto. E2E is only enabled on private chats. By default private chat exist only on the device they were created on. So a lot of people don't really use them.

So, in terms of encryption alone, Signal/Whatapp are safer.

I don't know about you, but for me, the last company I'll trust with my information is Facebook.

So if you can, use Signal.

If not, decide who you trust more. Telegram or Facebook.

path: 0 1427660, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 5
MigratingtoLemmy 2 points 3 years ago

Session

path: 0 1427660 1474972, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
Lime66 1 point 3 years ago

No forward secrecy

path: 0 1427660 1474972 3071360, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
CrypticCoffee 1 point 3 years ago

Just to clarify. I thought WA had e2e encryption before Signal but got bought out by Facebook, so Signal developed including with e2e encryption and open source code (at least initially) as an alternative. Is that correct?

path: 0 1427660 1481665, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
pranqster 5 points 3 years ago

The Signal protocol (née TextSecure protocol) was created by Moxie Marlinspike and Trevor Perrin and Signal messenger (née TextSecure) was built from the ground up with e2ee. WhatsApp was acquired by Facebook without e2ee and Moxie later worked with them to integrate the Signal protocol for WhatsApp. Hope that clarifies.

path: 0 1427660 1481665 1485066, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
CrypticCoffee 1 point 3 years ago

I appreciate the clarification. Thanks.

path: 0 1427660 1481665 1485066 1497844, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
pabloscloud 16 points 3 years ago

Sticking to Signal is really the best option

path: 0 1437381, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
constantokra 4 points 3 years ago

If you can.actually get people to switch, you should look into simplex chat. It has a lot of really good features, you can run a CLI application on any servers you might have to send you notifications really easily, and it's being rather actively developed. A quick look at their website will show you how dedicated to privacy they are.

path: 0 1424368, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 4
14th_cylon 14 points 3 years ago path: 0 1424368 1425261, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
ips 2 points 3 years ago

I can recommend SimpleX, too. Easier to install, set up, understand and use, than Matrix for example. Very promising so far!

path: 0 1424368 1468974, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
red0888 3 points 3 years ago

@ips @constantokra fair enough but doesn't come anywhere close to Matrix though. Matrix is meant for privacy while simplex is meant for privacy + anonymity.

path: 0 1424368 1468974 1473140, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
ips 2 points 3 years ago

Well, I use and support both. Matrix is also coming along nicely. But SimpleX is already very usable for everyone as a mobile messenger, that does everything you’re used to from years of other apps. Very clean UX for me.

path: 0 1424368 1468974 1473140 1481267, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
mister_monster 3 points 3 years ago

Signal publishes a unique identifier and the board is like 50% feds with close intelligence ties. I use it, but only for those that insist. It's better than the other mainstream ones.

Use simplex.

path: 0 1498326, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
people_are_cute 3 points 3 years ago

Well, movie pirates use it so it must be safe! /s

Telegram has a lot of pros, but it can be safe only as long as you and every person in your circle sets it as such. Chats are not encrypted by default, you have to set it in group settings. Your phone number isn't hidden by default, you have to manually set its visibility to "Nobody". It even asks to let it pull your contacts, Facebook-style. There might be several such gimmicks, but generally they are easy to notice and control.

The biggest advantage(?) Telegram has is that everything is saved server-side instead of your phone. So you don't need to keep having to back up your chats and be scared of losing everything if you lost your phone.

path: 0 1422267, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 11
14th_cylon 11 points 3 years ago

The biggest advantage(?) Telegram has is that everything is saved server-side

yeah, having all your secret data on a server you know nothing about is massive advantage 😂

path: 0 1422267 1425469, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
caglel 1 point 3 years ago

There is an standard client-server encryption in Telegram. If you want e2e encrypted chat, then use Secret chats. Almost all messengers nowadays use client server encryption. So the biggest problem is not man-in-the-middle attack, but physical access to device by someone and malware installed via breaches.

path: 0 1422267 1422735, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
lo__ 3 points 3 years ago

@caglel @people_are_cute The standard encryption is utter trash. First, they never needed to make it. Ever. Second, it was audited and laughed at by everyone. Third, even after they fixed the issues, it's still laughed at by everyone.

path: 0 1422267 1422735 1429778, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
fuckyou_m8 1 point 3 years ago

What is the problem in asking for pulling your contact list? Isn't it to check which of your contacts also have telegram?

path: 0 1422267 1423616, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 7
constantokra 7 points 3 years ago

Pulling your contacts lets it get a pretty good fingerprint of who you are, from who you talk to. It can already get that from who you actually message, but it's getting a lot more information about you from pulling the whole list and not just who you talk to through telegram.

path: 0 1422267 1423616 1424263, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 6
fuckyou_m8 2 points 3 years ago

I understand, but if you are new to this conversation app, right after installing it would be good to know which of your contacts your are able to talk to there. I don't see asking one by one and adding them manually a good solution, maybe there is another one I don't see

path: 0 1422267 1423616 1424263 1424381, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 5
pabloscloud 5 points 3 years ago

Well, I'd say they can do that as long as it stays on my device like with Signal.

path: 0 1422267 1423616 1424263 1424381 1437440, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 4
freddy 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 1486397, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
privacyguides
privacyguides

@lemmy.one

login for more options
18764
647
3

In the digital age, protecting your personal information might seem like an impossible task. We’re here to help.

This is a community for sharing news about privacy, posting information about cool privacy tools and services, and getting advice about your privacy journey.


You can subscribe to this community from any Kbin or Lemmy instance:

Learn more...


Check out our website at privacyguides.org before asking your questions here. We've tried answering the common questions and recommendations there!

Want to get involved? The website is open-source on GitHub, and your help would be appreciated!


This community is the "official" Privacy Guides community on Lemmy, which can be verified here. Other "Privacy Guides" communities on other Lemmy servers are not moderated by this team or associated with the website.


Moderation Rules:

  1. We prefer posting about open-source software whenever possible.
  2. This is not the place for self-promotion if you are not listed on privacyguides.org. If you want to be listed, make a suggestion on our forum first.
  3. No soliciting engagement: Don't ask for upvotes, follows, etc.
  4. Surveys, Fundraising, and Petitions must be pre-approved by the mod team.
  5. Be civil, no violence, hate speech. Assume people here are posting in good faith.
  6. Don't repost topics which have already been covered here.
  7. News posts must be related to privacy and security, and your post title must match the article headline exactly. Do not editorialize titles, you can post your opinions in the post body or a comment.
  8. Memes/images/video posts that could be summarized as text explanations should not be posted. Infographics and conference talks from reputable sources are acceptable.
  9. No help vampires: This is not a tech support subreddit, don't abuse our community's willingness to help. Questions related to privacy, security or privacy/security related software and their configurations are acceptable.
  10. No misinformation: Extraordinary claims must be matched with evidence.
  11. Do not post about VPNs or cryptocurrencies which are not listed on privacyguides.org. See Rule 2 for info on adding new recommendations to the website.
  12. General guides or software lists are not permitted. Original sources and research about specific topics are allowed as long as they are high quality and factual. We are not providing a platform for poorly-vetted, out-of-date or conflicting recommendations.

Additional Resources:

go to feed...