That post seems to be missing.
schizo 299 points 2 years ago

Wow, a commercial open source product that COULD have pulled a rugpull, looked for all the world like they were planning a rugpull, just uh, did the right thing?

Good job, Bitwarden.

path: 0 13280400, hotness: undefined, score: 299, children: 10
gsfraley 77 points 2 years ago

I know, it's a huge relief seeing this as someone who uses the free tier. I think I'll cough up for the advanced tier if they stick to their guns on this decision.

path: 0 13280400 13280853, hotness: undefined, score: 77, children: 1
TheHobbyist 51 points 2 years ago

This. I will resume my recommendation of Bitwarden.

path: 0 13280400 13280853 13280878, hotness: undefined, score: 51, children: 0
octopus_ink 52 points 2 years ago

I'm sure all the folks who were quick to ignore or dismiss their clarification of the packaging issue at the time will be just as quick to make comments like these as they were to skewer them then.

path: 0 13280400 13281312, hotness: undefined, score: 52, children: 6
sugar_in_your_tea 7 points 2 years ago

I tried convincing people to give them the benefit of the doubt and see what they do, but no, everyone seemed to jump to conclusions.

Glad my trust wasn't misplaced this time. I have been and continue to be a paying customer.

path: 0 13280400 13281312 13313917, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 5
baatliwala 8 points 2 years ago

everyone seemed to jump to conclusions.

Honestly, everyone's been so burned by companies pulling the wool over their eyes that there's just no trust left. People were happy with Mozilla 5-6 years ago and nowadays everyone is a skeptic.

You might be right in this case but they weren't wrong.

path: 0 13280400 13281312 13313917 13316439, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 2
sugar_in_your_tea 3 points 2 years ago

I get it, some orgs/projects do bad things, and we should absolutely roast them for it. But I believe in giving the benefit of the doubt for a period before melting down.

For example:

  • Mozilla - looking into ads (and have been for a few years) as an alternative revenue source to Google search; I hate ads, but the browser is still better for me than others, so I'll wait to see what they are planning
  • Docker - moved to a commercial tier, but their community tier is still quite viable, so I still use it; I'm experimenting w/ alternatives, but I don't need to jump ship just yet (was getting ready a few years ago when they announced the separate "community" builds)
  • Opera - was never FOSS, but they were a good browser when they had their own engine; that changed, so I jumped ship and went back to Firefox (had left Firefox because I wanted more than just IE/Chrome/Firefox/Safari)
  • Ubuntu - I used them for a while, but they kept making changes I and the community didn't like, so I bailed; this was long before the current snap nonsense, and I've stayed away ever since (switched to Fedora then Arch and now openSUSE)

When a software project you use changes for the worse, look for alternatives, but give that product time to fix it. If they continue on the negative path, then definitely bail. If everyone bails at the first hint of trouble, we end up with a ton of half-baked projects instead of a few good ones. Give feedback and support good projects.

path: 0 13280400 13281312 13313917 13316439 13322901, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Llewellyn 2 points 2 years ago

but no, everyone seemed to jump to conclusions

And I'm certain that it has served as the catalyst for the bitwarden decision.

path: 0 13280400 13281312 13313917 13315142, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
sugar_in_your_tea 1 point 2 years ago

I disagree, but unfortunately, we will probably never know. That said, I'm not against the outrage, I'm just against the conclusions. You don't need to immediately abandon a project at the slightest hint they're moving in a direction you don't like, what you should do is start watching that project a bit more closely to see if they correct or they make additional changes you don't like.

We should be taking the rational approach instead of the reactionary approach, but social media in general seems to love reacting instead. I've abandoned projects that went a direction I don't like, but I usually give them a few months after the first sign of problems. I'm currently doing that w/ Mozilla and I want to see what they do with their advertising push before jumping ship.

path: 0 13280400 13281312 13313917 13315142 13322740, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
njordomir 15 points 2 years ago

I will remember this, even more so because of the confused drama that preceded it. In general, I find it difficult for me to endorse any commercial entity, but Bitwarden has my admiration and I will continue to offer it as a better alternative to people I see storing their passwords in Chrome or Lastpass. I'm also happy to pay a bit to support a good product and will continue to support the development even if I switch to self-hosted at some point.

path: 0 13280400 13284751, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
compostgoblin 77 points 2 years ago

Pretty cool, good on ya Bitwarden

path: 0 13280879, hotness: undefined, score: 77, children: 0
BassTurd 47 points 2 years ago

I'm so glad this happened. I really wanted to believe them when they said it was an error and would corrected. It appears that in relatively short order they addressed the issue, gave an explanation, an expectation, then nailed it. I hate when I recommend something, then have to backtrack because they changed.

path: 0 13285916, hotness: undefined, score: 47, children: 0
radamant 5 points 2 years ago

I think I'm still switching to keepassxc, but I'll still recommend bitwarden to normal people (and my bitwarden account is paid til 2027 anyway, lol)

path: 0 13295489, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
NuXCOM_90Percent 4 points 2 years ago

Keepassxc is great if you don't need to synchronize passwords across too many locations and do not require anything where state matters (mostly related to stuff like yubikeys). It DOES have the vulnerability in that a bad actor has infinite time to crack it should they get a hold of the file whereas bitwarden still lives on a server.

But they are very different products with very different capabilities. Whether someone needs bitwarden over keepass is going to be a question of use cases.

path: 0 13295489 13311408, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
redditReallySucks 5 points 2 years ago

I use syncthing to sync my db and it works really well.

path: 0 13295489 13311408 13315758, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
penquin -47 points 2 years ago
path: 0 13281645, hotness: undefined, score: -47, children: 12
Badeendje 73 points 2 years ago

Never attribute to malice what can just as easily be explained by incompetence.

path: 0 13281645 13281864, hotness: undefined, score: 73, children: 3
Appoxo 25 points 2 years ago

Or just wanting to get done with the day and pushing to last commit.

path: 0 13281645 13281864 13285071, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 2
Badeendje 6 points 2 years ago

Yeah..

path: 0 13281645 13281864 13285071 13286404, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
sugar_in_your_tea 3 points 2 years ago

Yup, just replace "incompetence" w/ "laziness" or whatever and you'll be right much of the time.

path: 0 13281645 13281864 13285071 13286404 13313934, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Appoxo 39 points 2 years ago

Imagine being unable to do any mistake in a larger org.

path: 0 13281645 13285053, hotness: undefined, score: 39, children: 0
BearOfaTime 35 points 2 years ago

There was a really good explanation by a rando about how it happened. Seems a dev made a mistake when publishing a change.

Apparently bitwarden immediately changed internal procedure for publishing changes.

path: 0 13281645 13283528, hotness: undefined, score: 35, children: 0
Bezier 6 points 2 years ago

I expected the same by default, but after learning more I find it unlikely. They had a pretty good explanation for it being a mistake.

path: 0 13281645 13295197, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
frayedpickles 0 points 2 years ago

You're cynical, and worse, in a way that is unproductive.

path: 0 13281645 13314313, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 4
penquin -3 points 2 years ago
path: 0 13281645 13314313 13319595, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 3
Abnorc 2 points 2 years ago
path: 0 13281645 13314313 13319595 13323008, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
penquin 0 points 2 years ago
path: 0 13281645 13314313 13319595 13323008 13325950, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
frayedpickles 1 point 2 years ago

You literally asked us to call you cynical, dumdum. Why are you asking for something and then getting butthurt when it's provided? That's what toddlers do.

path: 0 13281645 13314313 13319595 13320351, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

thanks for using Leebra!

go to feed...