Or even average looking.
In using Stable Diffusion for a DnD related project, I've found that it's actually weirdly hard to get it to generate people (of either sex) that aren't attractive - I wonder if it's a bias in the training materials, or a deliberate bias introduced into the models because most people want attractive people in their AI pics
It's trained on professionally taken photos. Professional photographers tend to prefer taking photos of attractive subjects.
That's true, but it's not like ugly people don't get photographed - ultimately a professional photographer is going to take photos of whoever pays them to do so. That explanation accounts for part of the bias I think, but not all of it
They were created via a prompt, that prompt probably included some tags to make them more attractive. It's often standard practice to put tags like "ugly" and "deformed" into the negative prompts just to keep the hands and facial features from going wonky.
There are no elderly women, no female toddlers, and so forth either. Presumably just not what whoever generated this was going for. You can get those from many AI models if you want them.
Battleship coordinates, (B10). Also (I4) looks a lot like my niece. I really think it depends on your definition of "average" though. But as @fubo indicated. There are 0% black people in this photo. There's some vaguely Asian, roughly Middle Eastern looking, sort of South American, and whatever that is going on in (M8). But there are distinctly zero black people pictured.
Now I'm curious. What's average looking to you if none of these aren't?
It's one thing that strikes me as kinda odd.
But then, the other day I was messing around with an image generation model and it took me way too long to realize that it was only generating East Asian-looking faces unless explicitly instructed not to.
Just like birds.
That's a lot of white chicks.
Really it's like 6, copy pasted over and over
Yeah, a lot of the faces look very very similar!
Points to a limited dataset including mostly white people
Without knowing the prompt vs the model, it's impossible to say which side of things is responsible for the lack of variety.
Many modern models are actually very good at reversing sample biases in the training set.
Good point
casually takes off pressurized helmet on the moon
Where is it? I looked everywhere, couldn't find it.
My god, soon they will be making them nsfw!
They what!? Oh my
Oh, they definitely are already
For example, NSFW obviously:
Even the genitals are amazingly accurate (nsfw) - https://imgur.io/gallery/H5nPH
I believe they are already doing that to make fake nude leaks for celebrities. It'll be scary.
Impressive and a bit horrifying. Still, it seems to have a big problem recreating hands. A dating profile with a set of profile pics that doesn't feature a hand will now become suspect... until it cracks hands, too.
Not really. OP doesn't mention how they were generated, and how the pictures were selected.
It could just reflect the kinds of photos that went into the image generator, and the biases that were in its training data, unless the photos were chosen based on an attractiveness survey or some such.
Most of these look like the same person with different hair and makeup, so it could just be a very specialized network.
This AI has a type
L15 also, wtf is going on there
I can't decide if B8 or L15 is my favourite.
The one right below it has 6 fingers also
There's a ton of fucked up hands in there. It also seems to struggle with handbags. It's kinda fun to try to find one that isn't flawed in some way, I haven't found one that isn't.
The hands are the giveaway in an otherwise convincing image almost every time.
L15 has a unibutt
And sadly her friend is looking at it and laughing. Some friend.
Check out the fand on A7
real females remixed
But clearly that was the dataset used here.
This is wild.
Is there a source or article to read or something?
At least 15 of those women are mila kunis
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...
Oh, is that why none of them are black?
save