Judge nixes a Biden rule in order to keep medical debt on credit reports | CNN Business
a year ago by icegladiator to c/news
Yeah, let's just ruin everyone's credit with medical debt so we can stop buying bullshit overpriced cars and accruing ludicrous quantities of credit cards. The main downside I see is if this acts as another barrier to home ownership. But then, of course, the banks will begin getting pissy if they can't loan to anyone.
I can only see this backfiring on the economy--theres only so much money allocated to people's pockets, and this is the federal government deciding that the medical industry gets to have a larger share of it.
Yeah they don't understand more and more households are resorting to credit for so many purchases not because of frivolous spending, but because more people have to decide now between that or being homeless.
For-profit healthcare is inherently unethical.
*evil
Judge could use an unscheduled leg amputation followed by a bath in sewage and HIV and hep C blood, then maybe they find out how easy medical debt grows
Federal judges are insured on the taxpayer dime.
denied! trumpidiotism is a pre-existing condition.
Are they? Do they not just have a (probably very robust) plan through their job like everyone else? I.e. taking money from their paycheck to pay for it? Of course having such a massive workforce would allow them to offer great insurance, I imagine.
I could be wrong, but I don't believe judges are on Tricare or anything like that.
They have FEHB same as many federal employees. This gives them even more options than ACA and allows them to keep health insurance into retirement. The federal government like any employer covers a lot of their premiums.
It's a good thing it only applies in that district now.
They need prison.
You're much too kind.
bOtH SiDeZ
At the risk of being downvoted to hell. I agree. This rule never made sense as medical debt is a real thing and it does impact someone's ability to pay back a loan. The banks were never going to eat this cost, they were going to spread it to everyone else. The real problem is the cost of the medical care and with insurance. This is just something that sounded nice to the dem base.
Medical debt is in no way the same as other debt though. It's not the same as real debt. For one you're dealing with the cartel system that is medical insurance. So it's not a fair Marketplace to begin with. However the real kicker is you don't have a choice on it. Oftentimes you're injured and are brought to a hospital and you don't have time or the ability to call your insurances 24/7 helpline to figure out what the prices are and where what hospital you should go to. Medical debt is often involuntary and a matter of life and death. Not even mentioning the Absurd disgusting costs of it.
You simply can't compare it to someone taking too big of a loan for a car. And frankly saying well the real problem is something else doesn't really help actual living human beings. Because that real problem is not going to be solved and this could have helped people. You can't let this Pie in the Sky idealism stop us from helping actual people right now. Someone shouldn't die on the streets because you think an ideal should be achieved first.
It is real debt in the sense that you have an obligation to pay it back. Sure, you don't have a choice to take it, but that doesn't mean it won't effect your finances.
I'm sure if they could get that info it would be on there. Seems like it would be useful for loan decisions.
Of course it's real debt, but taking it on is involuntary. It does not have the same behavioral predictive power as debt that exists because of bad financial decisions.
It might affect your ability to pay, but less so if it is not on the credit report to begin with.
Studies by the CFPB say you are wrong. Where is your evidence that you are correct?
Thanks for the link! Yeah it does seem like my understanding is incorrect here "CFPB’s research reveals that a medical bill on a person’s credit report is a poor predictor of whether they will repay a loan,"
My argument is a purely logic based one. Lenders make money by giving out loans, so it's against their interest to deny loans to people which are capable of repaying them.
So the finding is a bit surprising, but willing to admit I'm wrong here :)
I mean I guess it makes sense. You have an accident and suddenly went into debt for 500,000 dollars. You need to replace your car also. You certainly could afford a 400 dollar a month car note. You most likely can't afford the 2000/month to pay it off in 20 years.
There hits a point of so far beyond reasonable that you just start saying fuck it and don't even try.
@lemmy.world
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
go to feed...
@lemmy.world
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
go to feed...
Anything to further class division.
save