FBI deployed 1,000 agents to search Epstein files for Trump mentions, whistleblower says
a year ago by Sundray to c/politics
Trump diddled kids.
Don't sugarcoat it like that. Donald J Trump repeatedly raped children.
I mean, we could go full Daenerys Targaryen with him and name all of his crimes, but it would taoe 3 paragraphs.
Like that one monkey’s name from Gintama 🤣
Edit: here’s a link if you want to hear it being spoken https://youtu.be/G_K9bn60A4g
BONGZINGO!!!
I bet there are people who will make Trump offers he can't refuse. Redacted material is best blackmail material.
1,000 Agents to comb through Documents that Don't Exist for the ONE Specific Name of Jeffrey Epstein's Best Friend who FIRED the Judge involved in Prosecuting Jeffrey Epstein sounds INNOCENT!
-Pizzagate Believers!
I feel like we're all glossing over the part where Epstein got murdered in his jail cell and the video recordings from the prison were manipulated while Trump was in charge (with Bill Barr in charge of the prison system and to such an extent that he was using prison guards as personal police for Trump).
If Epstein got murdered, wouldn't they kill his wife too?
1,000 people is a lot to involve in the coverup.
The more people involved the more likely it is that someone spills the details.
Did they do their darnedest to pick only people who are true believers? No doubt. Is that a property that's perfectly ascertainable and immutable? Absolutely not.
The number of people increases the difficulty of hiding a conspiracy, but so does the time scale. I suspect we'll know a lot more than we do now in 20 years about this, for whatever that's worth.
Or subpoenaed.
TESTIFY!
1000 agents who could have been investigating crimes on behalf of victims. Instead, they were tasked with protecting a perpetrator.
e: also, jesus christ, how much work should it take to investigate and flag one ’innocent’ person’s references? 1,000 agents? How many man-hours is that? The man-hours that could have been spent for victims is one unconscionable thing – but how many man-hours should it take to bury this? That’s staggering. I thought we mostly knew what was in these files, but I’d also think 10 agents would be more than enough. What the fuck are we missing?
If they spent just one business day on this, that'd be 8000 man hours, at least as I understand it.
Stretch that out to a single agent working standard work weeks (40 hours) that breaks down to 200 work weeks for a single agent.
That is almost 4 years of work for a single agent, assuming no vacations or other time off (illness, car trouble, etc)
I don't know if that helps you quantify it, but it helped put it in perspective for me.
Allegedly, there are some 100k pages to go through. As a "deadline" approaches as Wayne from Letterkenny say, "More hands, less work"
This is a waste of time and "efficency" for someone who claims to not know a thing
This is the kind of "efficiency" that pleases Taco and his cult. Cancer research? Keep kids from starving to death? Fuck that noise. We need to protect Taco from his own crimes...
1000 people pouring over docs that like a week ago "didn't exist" and were a "hoax" just to burn the ones with Trump's name on them seems to indicate there's either 1) a fuck tonne of documents or 2) Trump is mentioned a fuck tonne in those documents.
I can't stop thinking everything going on now is america... The CIA and FBI etc. breaking things down to rebuild them in a way they can create more control but blame it on somebody (trump/maga/etc). because it all feels like the way they throw coups in foreign countries.
Or at least very deeply intertwined in the FBI and CIA.
Like they are dismantling things to pave the way for a more "modern" society... Ai... Digital currency... Drone usage and surveillance... But they blame it on all the manufactured political bullshit going on because they know the citizens wouldn't be down for it without getting psychologically manipulated.
Trump isn't meant to make these things happen... He's psychology getting people used to the idea (as a puppet, not by his own understanding of the plan he's being used for). So when trump is out, the next guy will look like the "good cop" fixing things, but in reality putting the same bullshit ideas in place under a branding that Americans are currently getting psychologically prepared to accept.
Power, control, and business come before honest humanity. Always. As time goes on its as if average regular americans become more of a product than a human people. We can be written off for the benefit of the company/business. It does happen, it is happening.
Well, you know how two agents typing on a keyboard makes searches that much faster? Now imagine a thousand agents.
“Whistleblower”
Sure.
I just don't believe anything about this case either way.
I believe Trump and Epstein were friends, and that Trump is a rapist, and that Trump knew Epstein was trafficking and raping children, because those are all things Trump has admitted or confirmed out loud into a microphone on camera. I don't need additional proof of any of those things, but I would not be surprised to learn that it exists in the Epstein files.
Trump also denied all of those things, but that's not he said/she said where you have to present both sides as though they are equal. A man who constantly changes his story is not a credible source of information, and his denials can be dismissed outright.
@lemmy.world
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
go to feed...
@lemmy.world
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
go to feed...
So they hid everything implicating trump, and trump yelling about releasing files now is because he knows his buddies kash and bongino have confirmed this. We can assume anything released with Trump's approval has been doctored or has relevant info removed.
Trump diddled kids.
save