Sam Altman admits OpenAI ‘totally screwed up’ its GPT-5 launch and says the company will spend trillions of dollars on data centers

a year ago by themachinestops to c/technology

Altman also said that he thinks we’re in an AI “bubble.”

“I literally lost my only friend overnight with no warning,” one person posted on Reddit, lamenting that the bot now speaks in clipped, utilitarian sentences. “The fact it shifted overnight feels like losing a piece of stability, solace, and love.”

https://www.reddit.com/...

load all comments
Eggyhead 67 points a year ago

It annoys me that Chat GPT flat out lies to you when it doesn’t know the answer, and doesn’t have any system in place to admit it isn’t sure about something. It just makes it up and tells you like it’s fact.

path: 0 18893434, hotness: undefined, score: 67, children: 35
Evotech 46 points a year ago

It doesn't admit anything, it's a language machine

path: 0 18893434 18893489, hotness: undefined, score: 46, children: 0
kadup 42 points a year ago

LLMs don't have any awareness of their internal state, so there's no way for them to see something as a gap of knowledge.

path: 0 18893434 18896523, hotness: undefined, score: 42, children: 12
Doorknob 34 points a year ago

Took me ages to understand this. I'd thought "If an AI doesn't know something, why not just say so?“

The answer is: that wouldn't make sense because an LLM doesn't know ANYTHING

path: 0 18893434 18896523 18896592, hotness: undefined, score: 34, children: 1
figjam -1 points a year ago

Wouldn't it make sense for an ai to provide a confidence level though?

I've got 3 million bits of info on this topic but only 4 of them lead to this solution. Confidence level =1.5%

path: 0 18893434 18896523 18896726, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 9
bestboyfriendintheworld 28 points a year ago

Chat GPT makes up everything it says. It’s just good at guessing and bullshitting.

path: 0 18893434 18894297, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 1
Lodespawn 14 points a year ago

It's literally a guess machine ..

path: 0 18893434 18894297 18894639, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
CosmoNova 25 points a year ago

It doesn‘t know that it doesn‘t know because it doesn‘t actually know anything. Most models are trained on posts from the internet like this one where people rarely ever just chime in to admit they don‘t have an answer anyway. If you don‘t know something you either silently search the web for an answer or ask.

So since users are the ones asking ChatGPT, the LLM mimics the role of a person that knows the answer. It only makes sense AI is a „confidently wrong“ powerhouse.

path: 0 18893434 18894906, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 0
Squizzy 9 points a year ago

It wouldnt finish a lyric for me yesterday because it was copyrighted. I sid it was public domain and it said "You are absolutely right, given its release date it is under copyright protection"

Wtf

path: 0 18893434 18895366, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 2
int32 11 points a year ago

yeah, there are guardrails but for copyright, not for bullshit. ig they think copyrighted content is worse than bullshit.

path: 0 18893434 18895366 18895587, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1
WanderingThoughts 9 points a year ago

In the end it's a word generator that has been trained so much it uses facts often enough to be convincing. That's its basic architecture.

You can ask it to give a confidence level to have an indication of how sure it is of the answer.

path: 0 18893434 18894206, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
JayGray91 7 points a year ago

Someone I know (not close enough to even call an "internet friend") formed a sadistic bond with chatGPT and will force it to apologize and admit being stupid or something like that when he didn't get the answer he's looking for.

I guess that's better than doing it to a person I suppose.

path: 0 18893434 18893986, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
melroy 7 points a year ago

It's a feature. Not a bug of LLMs.

path: 0 18893434 18896157, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 4
Electricd 2 points a year ago

It’s neither. It’s a design flaw. They’re not designed to be able to handle this type of situation correctly

You out there spreading misinformation, saying they’re a manipulation tool. No, they were never invented for this.

path: 0 18893434 18896157 18921263, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
bestboyfriendintheworld 6 points a year ago

Chat GPT makes up everything it says. It’s just good at guessing and bullshitting.

path: 0 18893434 18894316, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
BlueCanoe 3 points a year ago

That’s actually one thing that got significantly improved with GPT-5, fewer hallucinations. Still not perfect of course

path: 0 18893434 18907755, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
Eggyhead 4 points a year ago

I’m more inclined to believe it’s gotten better at being convincing.

path: 0 18893434 18907755 18912483, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
Awkwardparticle 2 points a year ago

It is a system that outputs an answer that is the most probably correct one from what it processes from the inputs. It does not have the concept of creating a lie. It is just a probability machine.

path: 0 18893434 18916172, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
frog_brawler 2 points a year ago
path: 0 18893434 18916443, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
lichtmetzger 1 point a year ago

And depending on how OpenAI tweaked it this time it will either realize its mistake after being made aware of it or double down even harder on it.

I only use it for coding and it once told me my code not working was due to a bug in Webkit, so I asked it which bug specifically. It created links to bug reports but rewrote the titles of them. So initially it looked like it had numerous sources that backed up its statement but when I clicked on them those were bugs about totally different things.

It would not back down even after I specifically told it "You just made all of this shit up and even rewrote the titles" and got stuck in a loop of "I'm sorry, but you're wrong and I am 100% sure I haven't made a mistake".

Kinda creepy. Especially when you think about the system rewriting reality when it comes to much more important things. Let's just reinvent some history, that would be a good idea, right?

path: 0 18893434 18929807, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Eggyhead 2 points a year ago

I sometimes approach this like I do with students. Using your example, I’d ask it to restate the source, then ask it to read the title of that source directly. If it’s correct, I might ask it to briefly summarize what the source article covers. Then I would ask it to restate what it told me about the source earlier, and to explain where the inconsistency lies. Usually by this time, the AI is accurately pointing out flaws in its prior logic. At that point I ask again if it is 100% sure it didn’t make a mistake, and it might actually concede to having been wrong. Then I tell it to remember how and why it was wrong to avoid similar errors in the future. I don’t know if it actually works, but it makes me feel better about it.

path: 0 18893434 18929807 19003569, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
technology
technology

@lemmy.world

login for more options
88765
22238
14582

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


go to feed...