AI company Anthropic agrees to pay $1.5B to settle lawsuit with authors

a year ago by MicroWave to c/news

If approved, the settlement would be the largest in the history of American copyright cases, according to a lawyer for the authors behind the lawsuit.

Anthropic, a major artificial intelligence company, has agreed to pay at least $1.5 billion to settle a copyright infringement lawsuit filed by a group of authors who alleged the platform had illegally used pirated copies of their books to train large-language models, according to court documents.

“If approved, this landmark settlement will be the largest publicly reported copyright recovery in history, larger than any other copyright class action settlement or any individual copyright case litigated to final judgment,” said Justin Nelson, a lawyer for the authors.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in California last year, centered on roughly 500,000 published works. The proposed settlement amounts to a gross recovery of $3,000 per work, Nelson said in a memorandum to the judge in the case.

frongt 44 points a year ago

It's a start. Now do openai, Facebook, and the rest of them. Hopefully it's not reduced on appeal.

path: 0 19231634, hotness: undefined, score: 44, children: 1
halcyoncmdr 19 points a year ago

Hopefully it's not reduced on appeal.

It's a settlement, not a judgement. Both sides agreed to this amount to end the lawsuit. Means there is no legal precedent set either.

path: 0 19231634 19232948, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 0
WalnutLum 28 points a year ago

Their predicted 2025 revenue is supposedly 5 billion so this is a decent chunk.

Not enough, but a decent chunk.

path: 0 19232047, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 12
FlowVoid 17 points a year ago

They were also forced to delete the pirated works from their training data. Which means they might have problems training the next version of their LLM, and if so that revenue is going to dry up.

path: 0 19232047 19233303, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 11
ArrantKnave 7 points a year ago

If true, great, but I fear they'll "delete" it.

path: 0 19232047 19233303 19233436, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
FlowVoid 3 points a year ago

I doubt it. How would they keep disgruntled ex-employees from spilling the beans?

path: 0 19232047 19233303 19233436 19234036, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
GissaMittJobb 3 points a year ago

They essentially still have the information in the weights, so I guess they won't fret too much over not having it in the original training data.

path: 0 19232047 19233303 19236048, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 8
FlowVoid 3 points a year ago

They will need actual training data when they want to develop the next version of their LLM.

path: 0 19232047 19233303 19236048 19237883, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 7
GissaMittJobb 3 points a year ago

I guess it depends on how important old data is when building upon new models, which I fully admit I don't know the answer to. As I understand it though, new models are not trained fully from scratch, but instead are a continuation of the older model trained with new techniques/new data.

To speculate, I guess not having the older data present in the new training stages might make the attributes of that data be less pronounced in the new output model.

Maybe they could cheat the system by trying to distill that data out of the older models and put that into the training data, but I guess the risk of model collapse is not-insignificant there

Again, limited understanding here, take everything I speculate with a grain of salt

path: 0 19232047 19233303 19236048 19237883 19239809, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 6
TooManyGames 19 points a year ago

This is interesting, because a judge just let Meta off the hook for downloading copyrighted works from pirate sites and even using Metas vast infrastructure to try to hide it. It's curious that Anthropic has to pay and Meta doesn't.

path: 0 19234843, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 2
pedroapero 6 points a year ago

That's a settlement, they did not have to, but voluntarily did before the verdict.

path: 0 19234843 19245249, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
TooManyGames 5 points a year ago

That clarifies it, so Anthropic kinda chickened out and considered it safer to make this a cost of doing business thing.

path: 0 19234843 19245249 19245689, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
ZoteTheMighty 8 points a year ago

Amazing, let's not forget that not a single AI company is profitable, and it's very possible that AI won't get substantially better than this. They're just shoveling billions of dollars into this thing as "the cost of doing business", and they probably won't see a real ROI from it.

path: 0 19233996, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
Arcane2077 6 points a year ago

Damn shame. America is a joke

path: 0 19234347, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
news
news

@lemmy.world

login for more options
39550
40355
9697

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

go to feed...