Pentagon Pete Fires ‘Fat’ Soldiers as War on Weight Rages

10 months ago by Redditsux to c/politics

Some Texas National Guard members were sent home from Illinois for not making the cut.
load all comments
Archangel1313 160 points 10 months ago

Ooh, ooh...do the Commander in Chief next. He's the fattest one of all.

path: 0 19919061, hotness: undefined, score: 160, children: 17
Shay20 -76 points 10 months ago

You mean civilian leadership vs military leadership?

FDR won WWII from a wheelchair, your comment makes no sense.

path: 0 19919061 19920406, hotness: undefined, score: -76, children: 16
Jtotheb 38 points 10 months ago

Sorry, what’s the purported correlation between FDR’s paralysis and Trump’s general unhealthiness?

path: 0 19919061 19920406 19922247, hotness: undefined, score: 38, children: 15
Shay20 -35 points 10 months ago

The idea that the CiC needs to be physically fit to do the job.

path: 0 19919061 19920406 19922247 19922258, hotness: undefined, score: -35, children: 14
Jtotheb 34 points 10 months ago

Well, they obviously do need to be fit for the job, hence Trump’s mental decline being even more concerning than his original mental state. Given the lack of fit Americans interested in enlistment you might also think a bit of leading by example couldn’t hurt. And of course, I’d hate to be a National Guard member in an administrative role sent home for optics when I didn’t need to be physically fit to perform my job.

path: 0 19919061 19920406 19922247 19922258 19922402, hotness: undefined, score: 34, children: 7
Shay20 -36 points 10 months ago

“Do need to be fit”

So FDR was fit in his wheelchair when he won WWII?

Seriously, military leadership and civilian are wildly different.

“Optics”

It’s standards and discipline, not optics. Can’t meet the standard, tough shit.

path: 0 19919061 19920406 19922247 19922258 19922402 19922413, hotness: undefined, score: -36, children: 6
Jtotheb 21 points 10 months ago

Are you trying to have a “gotcha” moment here? You’re arguing with yourself. You’ve already stated the commander in chief doesn’t need to be physically fit to serve, and I’ve not disagreed, and already stated that their mental state is of much more concern to me.

I don’t think we’re going to have a meaningful conversation on something quite as nuanced as leading by example, so let’s just call that one a mulligan.

Anyone in the National Guard has already met the organization’s standards, and moves by the presidential administration to change those standards as a direct response to bad optics are obviously done to improve the optics

path: 0 19919061 19920406 19922247 19922258 19922402 19922413 19922507, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 4
phutatorius 6 points 10 months ago

You know the difference, so you're just nagging.

path: 0 19919061 19920406 19922247 19922258 19922402 19922413 19927582, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
politics
politics

@lemmy.world

login for more options
30855
32686
9702

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

go to feed...