I mean, the full letter seems like a lot more than that. There's complaints about 'branding', and 'identity', and 'intent', most of which strays away from supportability and into the realm of concerns about control.
I mean, the full letter seems like a lot more than that. There's complaints about 'branding', and 'identity', and 'intent', most of which strays away from supportability and into the realm of concerns about control.
That doesn't "generate publicity" in an asinine manner. Rejected.
Except that it would be like the meme where a guy shoots the app and then says "How could the app's developer have let this happen?"
Tired of people being "dont' make an open-source app then xD".
This letter has nothing against the hobyist that theme their system for fun and everything against distro that put their own stylesheet as default breaking something and leaving the maintenance burden to the app dev.
And before I hear "Word that differently then" I want people to remeber the main way you will see this is as a github badge and that other aproch have already been tried over the course of the last 15 last years. Hell I've been guilty of reporting an issue with an app because the ubuntu gtk2 stylesheet was breaking icons.
Sorry for the incoherent rambling.
No, Debian never had a custom preinstalled theme afaik
I'm not aware of any distro who kept their custom themes after this letter was published. ZorinOS still has some theming, but it looks like they only slightly changed some colors (where the previous one was rather invasive)
Even if it WERE, they can't stop you. They can only punish you post hoc.
…Have you read the thing?
@sopuli.xyz
A little experimental Linux memes community. We'll see how this works out!
go to feed...
@sopuli.xyz
A little experimental Linux memes community. We'll see how this works out!
go to feed...
Would have been better to frame it this way.
save