I read this, but I don’t really understand what it’s saying. It doesn’t seem really clear to me. Is witness information? The person who witnessed this or what?

save

path: 0 21178019, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1

Drusas 2 points 6 months ago

I people are eagerly overlooking that part.

save

path: 0 21178019 21178442, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

jeffw 6 points 6 months ago

As much as I hate the man, you guys realize that allegations aren’t convictions, right? Like, I literally could’ve called up the FBI and said this

save

path: 0 21177217, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 8

pelespirit 33 points 6 months ago

This is from 2016 and testimony. She was threatened and then she disappeared. Do you think we should ignore this too or nah?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRZa_cVshcI

save

path: 0 21177217 21177428, hotness: undefined, score: 33, children: 0

snooggums 21 points 6 months ago

Fuck off.

When dozens of people make allegations over decades we should fucking believe them.

save

path: 0 21177217 21177268, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 4

Serinus 12 points 6 months ago

We need this grain of salt reminder near the top. Maybe not the actual top.

save

path: 0 21177217 21177268 21177325, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0

fdon48g6dj53gj7idh7k 5 points 6 months ago

Notice how they did not say anything to the effect of this is not true? Well the OP title does assert that it is true; while it is potentially true (and should not be dismissed outright considering the circumstances, Trump being an absolute scumbag, his known past, etc), evidence and proof are kind of important if one actually cares about finding the truth of anything. Ignore that at your own peril.

save

path: 0 21177217 21177268 21177487, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2

snooggums 11 points 6 months ago

Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is for courts.

Overwhelming numbers of accusations is enough outside of courts. Victims, especially women who are victims, are overwhelmingly ignored because of a lack of proof.

Is one questionable? Maybe.

Dozens? We shouldn't dismiss them because they haven't already secured a conviction, especially since the whole system works against them.

save

path: 0 21177217 21177268 21177487 21177595, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1

fdon48g6dj53gj7idh7k 3 points 6 months ago

Either you're being disingenuous or you really need to work on your reading comprehension. I specifically mentioned evidence, not just proof, and specifically stated should not be dismissed outright.

This, and so many other accounts, very well could be true. Determining whether or not any particular one actually is should be valued.

save

path: 0 21177217 21177268 21177487 21177595 21178190, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0

SkybreakerEngineer 16 points 6 months ago

Then I guess the only bad thing he's ever done was cheat on his taxes. Definitely doesn't have a history of wriggling out of prosecutions, especially not for stuff he did live on national TV

save

path: 0 21177217 21177390, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0

neatchee 5 points 6 months ago

But it's so credible! Especially the part about.... Lake Michigan -_- .... Because when I think of Donald Trump I think of the great lakes. Don't you? 🙄

save

path: 0 21177217 21177324, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0

TheTechnician27 3 points 6 months ago

Rule 1, OP.

save

path: 0 21177410, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0

jordanlund 2 points 6 months ago

Image posts are not allowed.

save

path: 0 21178549, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

kingofras 1 point 6 months ago

save

path: 0 21178454, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

thanks for using Leebra!

go to feed...

thanks for using Leebra!

go to feed...