Are there any ai organizations you trust?

9 months ago by mystic-macaroni to c/asklemmy

E.g. ollama/hugging face

Earthman_Jim 14 points 9 months ago

Nope.

path: 0 21411748, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
moistracoon 13 points 9 months ago
path: 0 21408273, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 1
selokichtli 1 point 9 months ago

I'm in the same boat. The way it's been used until now feels like mindlessly malnourishing the planet and the society. The AI economic bubble burst will be brutal, though.

path: 0 21408273 21419612, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Blackfeathr 10 points 9 months ago

None.

path: 0 21410517, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
DFX4509B 9 points 9 months ago

No.

path: 0 21411343, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
ArgumentativeMonotheist 9 points 9 months ago

What's an AI organisation? ๐Ÿค”

path: 0 21407934, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
retype 8 points 9 months ago

Probably an organization that had copilot shoehorned into. ๐Ÿ˜‚

path: 0 21407934 21408239, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
NihilsineNefas 6 points 9 months ago

Only the ones pushing medical/astronomical/scientific analysis of huge swathes of data that would be too much for a human to go through are acceptable in my mind.

Any company that's pushing a chatbot/'picture bot'/website generator/scalper/search engine can suck peanuts out of my taint

path: 0 21416283, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
nymnympseudonym 5 points 9 months ago

Mistral

The world needs more open source LLMs

path: 0 21408237, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 5
kadu 9 points 9 months ago

The world needs no more slop, open or not.

path: 0 21408237 21409686, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 4
nymnympseudonym 4 points 9 months ago path: 0 21408237 21409686 21410556, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 3
kadu 10 points 9 months ago

I'm a master in bioinformatics. Yes, I am aware.

AI for folding a protein is not a LLM.

path: 0 21408237 21409686 21410556 21415165, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 2
nymnympseudonym 0 points 9 months ago

Fine' it's a pLM not an LLM.

It still uses neural networks and backprop and attention heads. It's not like it's radically different computing paradigm FFS.

path: 0 21408237 21409686 21410556 21415165 21419302, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
Diplomjodler3 5 points 9 months ago

I trust all of them to be a criminal syndicate.

path: 0 21409072, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
sylver_dragon 4 points 9 months ago

I trust every AI group to do their level best to separate me from my money. Beyond that, I wouldn't trust them with a stolen identity.

path: 0 21418496, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
digdilem 3 points 9 months ago

You can't trust an inherantly untrustworthy industry.

The problem is that to make a good AI, you need a lot of input and we know from leaks and reports that many/most of the major players deliberately ignored copyright to train their models. If it was reachable, they used it. Are using it. Will use it. Like Johnny 5, there's no limit to the data they want, or that their handlers want to feed them with. They're the Cookie Monster at a biscuit factory.

So when the question of trust comes up, you'd have to be pretty forgiving to overlook that they're built on foundations of theft, and pretty naive to assume these companies have suddenly grown ethics and won't use your data and input to train with, even when you're using commercial systems that promise they won't.

Even in the event that there is an ethical provider that does their utmost to ensure your data doesn't migrate (these do exist, at least in intention), this is an incredibly fast moving, ultra-competitive market where huge amounts of data are shifted around constantly and guardrails being notoriously hard to accurately define, let alone enforce. It's inevitable stuff will leak.

path: 0 21421779, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
juliebean 3 points 9 months ago

MIRI seems to have their collective head on straight. i'd at least trust them more on the subject of AI than any of the blood swilling oligarchs running the big ai companies these days.

path: 0 21413525, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
HurlingDurling 3 points 9 months ago

It depends on your meaning of trust, trust in the answers, trust in your privacy, what kind of trust are we talking about? If we are talking about trust in the accuracy or usability of the data it responds with, I would say I trust copilot, grok, Claude, Lumo, and finally Gemini -- in that order. However, if we are talking about trusting them with your data to stay private, that is a big 'ol zero because none of them are private (Lumo might be the most private but I still don't trust it 100%).

My job asks us to use AI agents so I have been playing around with paid licenses on all of these (Lumo was tested on my personal computer)

path: 0 21418774, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
WhatGodIsMadeOf 3 points 9 months ago

There aren't any organizations at all that I trust... At all.

path: 0 21408493, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
FlyingSpaceCow -2 points 9 months ago

What do you mean trust? I prefer Anthropic/Claude for most things.

path: 0 21412845, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 1
PoliteDudeInTheMood 0 points 9 months ago

Ditto, I have a year of Gemini Pro, and a year of Perplexity Pro for free, but after using Claude for a month I've come to realize that Gemini is a moron, and Perplexity is just as bad.

Claude isn't heavily sanitized, Anthropic doesn't delete old chats it views as sensitive.

path: 0 21412845 21417082, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
asklemmy
asklemmy

@lemmy.ml

login for more options
55789
8843
4355

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๏ฟฝ*

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Icon by @Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de

go to feed...