18 years after Californians voted for High Speed Rail, with the SF-to-not-quite-LA segment still >12 years off, state is now exploring *High Speed Buses* to connect SF and LA in 3h at 140mph (225km/h)
a month ago by Arthur Besse to c/nottheonion
obligatory:
but we have chatgippity? That is so much better
the Onion already did this one:
Obama Replaces Costly High Speed Rail Plan With High Speed Bus Plan
(youtube)
amazing, thanks for the tip. i've taken this rare opportunity to cross-post to notnottheonion from nottheonion π
this is so fucking funny... I laugh at my own demise
No stop. Why does our world have to get increasingly absurd and shitty.
Are high speed buses a thing? 225 km/h with presumably rubber tires? Seems like it would be even harder than building tried and true high speed rail.
Also post apocalyptic Australia did it first, they want their desert speeders back and to be witnessed.
What if they fixed that issue by using metal wheels on a metal road?
Great idea. They could even attach lots of them together for better capacity and efficiency. Wonder why no one's thought of this?
Even if the vehicle itself is possible nothing is taking the existing highway curves at that speed. Either they need to have a huge radius or be banked. It's just ridiculous. It's like reading the hyperloop propaganda all over again.
I pray for nukes everyday baby. Clean slate. The world would be better. Yankkkeeland is a land of idolwhorshipers. We are still praying to the sun and making chatgipity porn on our "smart phones"
I am not getting in a death trap "dragster"-bus lol.
So reading the article it sounds like this is just a catchy headline. They're not seriously looking into building them:
βDespite significant engineering hurdles, it is conceptually feasible to operate buses safely at high speeds under controlled conditions,β the review reads. βHowever, real-world implementation requires incremental approaches, substantial investments in infrastructure, technology, and rigorous validation through field tests.β
βIt might offer as a complementary option alongside existing solutions like rail, not to replace them,β Mehdi Moeinaddini, a senior transportation planner at Caltrans, told KCRA about the high-speed buses."
Could be intended as a stopgap until the rail is complete. But yeah that first quote reads to me as a "we know this is a dumbfuck idea, but someone is insisting on us checking and isn't taking the hint when we try telling them."
I recommend looking at this map that includes all planned rails in gray.
Look at the one connecting Dalian and Yantai across the Bohai Strait (the one that forms a bay in the Northeast, near the Koreas). That's 120km of underwater tunnel, already in construction, planned to open in 2030
Edit: High res picture
We need both. High speed is vital for intercity travel, especially cities that people often drive to. Seattle to Portland to San Francisco to Los Angeles for example would cut down on a lot of drives and quite a few flights.
But we also need regular public transit, and the Seattle area is a great example of a part of the country moving in the right direction on that. Though they're focused on connecting suburbs and cometropolitan cities when they also need a subway. But you only have so much moneyβ¦
So now that the US has a dictator too it should be built bigly faster than before right? Riiiight?
@lemmy.ml
For true stories that are so ridiculous, that you could have sworn it was an !theonion worthy story.
go to feed...
@lemmy.ml
For true stories that are so ridiculous, that you could have sworn it was an !theonion worthy story.
go to feed...
save