Yeah, Obama's Iran deal didn't involve giving them $300B in war reparations.
Pete Hegseth Insists Trump Iran Deal Is Totally Different From Obama’s
6 days ago by sanitation to c/politics
OwOarchist 31 points 6 days ago
Ludicrous0251 57 points 6 days ago
I mean, it seems like we're gonna be paying them fuckloads of money to do the same thing they were doing, so that's new I guess.
hitmyspot 35 points 6 days ago
Yes, but this time there is no checks in nuclear. That will be decided later. They gave given their word there will be no nukes.
Strange, israel and the usa didnt believe them before when they said the same thing.
In fact, thats why there were checks, through the UN, which trump has messed up relations with, too. Its all so predictable and so incompetent.
Kirp123 14 points 6 days ago
If Iran wanted to have nukes they would have them by now. Their nuclear program was started in 1957. They have been enriching uranium for decades and yet no weapon. Now since Trump fucked them over so hard they may just reconsider.
davepleasebehave 1 point 6 days ago
it's truly the only way to be safe for them now.
phutatorius 8 points 6 days ago
israel and the usa didnt believe them before when they said the same thing.
There were international inspections. The US and Israel knew that there were no nukes.
Archangel1313 41 points 6 days ago
Well, yeah. Obama's deal didn't cost anything, or kill anyone.
phutatorius 27 points 6 days ago
It also improved on the status quo. Trump's made it far worse.
Besides an Epstein distraction and a favor for Netanyahu and the oil producers, I wonder how much of this murderous idiocy was was due to Trump's inferiority complex about Obama?
halcyoncmdr 21 points 6 days ago
Of course it is.
This time we're paying them $300 Billion... and they don't really have any requirements to follow.
kurmudgeon 13 points 6 days ago
Yeah, it's Obama's plan, plus we gave Iran $300 billion as a nice little cherry on top, because Trump is a collosal fucking moron.
phutatorius 4 points 6 days ago
Everything that involves Trump is far inferior to what Obama is or did.
And that's despite the fact that Obama was a president of only modest achievements. All it would have taken Trump is to not fuck up, and not to be fat, stupid, demented and crass.
CharlesDarwin 4 points 5 days ago
LOL, the Faux News personality is right.
Just not in the way he thinks he is....
Headofthebored 1 point 5 days ago
The only question is, did they learn anything?
politics
@lemmy.world
30158
30920
9765
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
go to feed...
politics
@lemmy.world
30158
30920
9765
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
go to feed...
He’s right!
…worse is different…
save