turdas 45 points 4 days ago

That source doesn't say that 80% of rivers do not support life anymore. It says that 78.8% of rivers in the dataset are showing signs of deoxygenation.

path: 0 24322691, hotness: undefined, score: 45, children: 4
FireRetardant 27 points 4 days ago

I was gonna say that seemed a little extreme. Rivers are defintely degrading, are having some species go extinct, and other serious problems but life is still quite persistent. Even extremely damaged ecosystems can bounce back relatively quickly with the proper care.

path: 0 24322691 24323420, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 2
NateNate60 14 points 4 days ago

During the (biologically) short two years of the COVID-19 pandemic when everyone was inside and factories were shut down, a lot of rivers and other natural ecosystems pretty much recovered to near pre-industrial health. Even the River Ganges started clearing up if I remember correctly.

path: 0 24322691 24323420 24323710, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 1
vivalapivo 1 point 4 days ago

Factories didn't work, Suez was blocked. We did alright

path: 0 24322691 24323420 24323710 24328294, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
ironycanal 1 point 3 days ago

Fucking commies, always lying about everything. Can't fucking trust em. Not like BP.

path: 0 24322691 24346307, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Objection 23 points 4 days ago

Love a properly-sourced meme ❤️

path: 0 24323296, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 0
NateNate60 15 points 4 days ago

Genuinely who has characterised environmental policies as "just wanting chaos"? I have never heard anyone of significant note say that.

path: 0 24323177, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 10
NaibofTabr 12 points 4 days ago

Not the policies, but certainly activists like Greta Thunberg have been characterized as angry extremists (by people who are financially interested in maintaining the status quo).

path: 0 24323177 24324319, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 5
NateNate60 -7 points 4 days ago

With Thunberg in particular, while I agree broadly with her on pretty much all of her policy stances, I can't help but also think that a lot of what she does is performative and doesn't really accomplish much on a practical level. I'm not stupid enough to think the goal is chaos but I think I understand how some people could be led to think that.

path: 0 24323177 24324319 24324757, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 4
ayyy 2 points 3 days ago

Then you are simply uninformed about her work. I do agree that she is portrayed that way by the media you consume.

path: 0 24323177 24324319 24324757 24337564, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
NateNate60 2 points 3 days ago

I am informed. I can see her activities. They range from very productive performatism to useless but mostly inert lip service.

For example her Gaza aid ship stunt I believe falls in the category of "very productive performatism". Obviously she is a kind of international political celebrity, and by forcing Israeli authorities to either arrest her (and cause a diplomatic incident) or allow a hole in their Gaza blockade, she's forcing the issue in a way that is both a good use of her infamy and also disproportionately impactful.

path: 0 24323177 24324319 24324757 24337564 24337848, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
tae_glas 7 points 4 days ago

it might be about characterising anarchists as "just wanting chaos", because a lot of people use anarchy and chaos as synonyms..?

i'm not certain, the "you guys" in the picture could be referring to someone else entirely and not anarchists at all!

path: 0 24323177 24323376, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
Objection 4 points 4 days ago

Dealing with those environmental problems requires breaking the corporate power the profits from and perpetuates those problems, and breaking corporate power does get characterized as "just wanting chaos" by plenty of people.

path: 0 24323177 24323321, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
NateNate60 1 point 4 days ago

Do you have an example? I haven't even seen the Washington Post characterise it that way. Most opponents just talk about how these policies will "destroy the competitiveness of our industry" or "raise prices for consumers".

path: 0 24323177 24323321 24323647, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Objection 2 points 4 days ago

Ask any right-winger what they think about protests about things like BLM or Palestine.

path: 0 24323177 24323321 24323647 24323734, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
vivalapivo 10 points 4 days ago

Also rainwater is no longer drinkable everywhere.

Guess a small price to pay for a few individuals to please their ego

path: 0 24322703, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
leftymemes
leftymemes

@lemmy.dbzer0.com

login for more options
7117
1032
3583

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of "ML" (read: Dengist) influence. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, discussion and agitprop/stuff that's better fit for a poster than a meme go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes

That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme. Please post agitprop here)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Try to use alt text or image descriptions to allow for greater accessibility

(Please take a look at our wiki page for the guidelines on how to actually write alternative text!)

We encourage alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


0.5.1 Style tip about abbreviations and short forms

When writing stuff like "lol" and "iirc", it's a good idea to try and replace those with their all caps counterpart

  • ofc => OFC
  • af = AF
  • ok => OK
  • lol => LOL
  • bc => BC
  • bs => BS
  • iirc => IIRC
  • cia => CIA
  • nato => Nato (you don't spell it when talking, right?)
  • usa => USA
  • prc => PRC
  • etc.

Why? Because otherwise (AFAIK), screen readers will try to read them out as actually words instead of spelling them


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here

Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such

That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.

That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" (read: Dengists) (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.

The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.


6. Don't irrationally idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.


  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:
  • Racism
  • Sexism
  • Queerphobia
  • Ableism
  • Classism
  • Sexual assault
  • Genocide/ethnic cleansing or (mass) deportations
  • Fascism
  • (National) chauvinism
  • Orientalism
  • Colonialism or Imperialism (and their neo- counterparts)
  • Zionism
  • Religious fundamentalism of any kind

go to feed...