IBM introduces the smallest computer chip in the world

4 months ago by ashenwire to c/technology

It’s the world’s first sub-1nm chip technology, powered by IBM’s new nanostack architecture, paving the way for more powerful chips for years to come.
tias 64 points 4 months ago

If that's the smallest computer chip in the world, the hand must be tiny

path: 0 24465008, hotness: undefined, score: 64, children: 0
jordanlund 60 points 4 months ago path: 0 24463370, hotness: undefined, score: 60, children: 1
tehBishop 11 points 4 months ago path: 0 24463370 24474811, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
A_norny_mousse 56 points 4 months ago

We learned to shoot lightning at sand until it could do math.

Great quote. The sand:

sand

path: 0 24464297, hotness: undefined, score: 56, children: 0
Anonymous_Leaker 22 points 4 months ago
path: 0 24462887, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 0
const_void 12 points 4 months ago

Wtf is a “computer chip”? A CPU?

path: 0 24471878, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1
WolfLink 15 points 4 months ago

They mean smallest transistor

path: 0 24471878 24472087, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
SharkAttak 7 points 4 months ago

Great! Just great. Now do the same to prices.

path: 0 24469167, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
pennomi -2 points 4 months ago
path: 0 24463068, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 10
aarch64 30 points 4 months ago

I'd say it's more an unfortunate consequence of confusing industry terminology. Sub-nanometer refers to the process, not the finished size of the chip. Smaller processes can fit more transistors in the same space.

path: 0 24463068 24464595, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 2
pennomi 2 points 4 months ago
path: 0 24463068 24464595 24467283, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
eleitl 6 points 4 months ago

The node sizes are backwards computed from the unit area of a one bit SRAM cell. It used to be the physical size of the smallest structure, e.g. a transistor gate.

I agree it's highly misleading. Also, people forget that the original Moore's law publication mention constant doubling time of transistors per area per unit of cost. So people keep pointing at multichip, thinned die stacking and 5 nm WSI like Cerebras to argue Moore scaling didn't die a long time ago, but ignore costs.

path: 0 24463068 24464595 24467283 24467815, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
victorz 21 points 4 months ago

The term "5 nm" does not indicate that any physical feature (such as gate length, metal pitch or gate pitch) of the transistors is five nanometers in size. Historically, the number used in the name of a technology node represented the gate length, but it started deviating from the actual length to smaller numbers (by Intel) around 2011.[3] According to the projections contained in the 2021 update of the International Roadmap for Devices and Systems published by IEEE Standards Association Industry Connection, the 5 nm node is expected to have a gate length of 18 nm, a contacted gate pitch of 51 nm, and a tightest metal pitch of 30 nm.[4] In real world commercial practice, "5 nm" is used primarily as a marketing term by individual microchip manufacturers to refer to a new, improved generation of silicon semiconductor chips in terms of increased transistor density (i.e. a higher degree of miniaturization), increased speed and reduced power consumption compared to the previous 7 nm process.

— https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5_nm_process

I agree that there should be a better way to describe these things. Why not describe the actual size like we used to. Quite strange.

path: 0 24463068 24464684, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 6
greyscale 2 points 4 months ago

Because while they weren't shrinking in that aspect, other things were shrinking.

Its similar to how BMW decoupled their model numbers from displacement quite some time ago. Its where it sits in "the ranking".

path: 0 24463068 24464684 24468199, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 5
victorz 2 points 4 months ago

Still no harm in changing the way in which we refer to the process to something more representative. It could signify a shift in manufacturing and you could spin it as a positive thing in marketing (which would surely not be lying).

path: 0 24463068 24464684 24468199 24473588, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Static_Rocket 2 points 3 months ago

Unfortunately a large part of marketing is people believing that others do not wish to be informed about such things. They just want to see "number move in good direction." The stats unfortunately prove that. Most marketing material now is basically lying through omission.

path: 0 24463068 24464684 24468199 24479633, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
zqps 2 points 3 months ago

Mercedes too. An E300 used to have 300cm³ of displacement.

Still it's better this way. People demanding huge displacement values for no fucking reason when technology has long moved on are among the dumbest on the planet.

path: 0 24463068 24464684 24468199 24481149, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
Hule 2 points 3 months ago

I'm sorry, but it is 3000cm³.

path: 0 24463068 24464684 24468199 24481149 24486134, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
technology
technology

@lemmy.world

login for more options
88745
22216
14627

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


go to feed...