Woman who dated Graham Platner says he sexually assaulted her

3 months ago by velma to c/politics

A woman who dated Maine U.S. Senate candidate Graham Platner says he forced her to have sex with him nearly five years ago despite her repeated objections, an allegation Platner denies.

The woman, a 41-year-old Maine resident named Jenny Racicot, detailed the alleged incident to POLITICO in three interviews over the past two weeks. POLITICO also spoke with a man Racicot dated and confided in the years after the alleged incident, and reviewed documents, including emails between Racicot and her therapist and messages between Racicot and an acquaintance whom she warned against getting involved with Platner years before he ran for office.

Racicot said she had an on-and-off relationship with Platner, who is now the Democratic Senate nominee in Maine, for more than two years before he entered her rural Maine home uninvited one night in late 2021, deeply intoxicated, and forced himself on her while she repeatedly told him to stop. She said she cut off contact with him after telling him the encounter was not consensual.

“I remember him grabbing my pelvis and being really forceful of me,” she said. “I remember the specific moment where I thought to myself, like, ‘This is no longer my choice.’”

iluvlamp37 55 points 3 months ago

Well this seems a lot more believable than everything in the NYT story. I was all in on Platner and still have some skepticism of this just due to the sheer amount of political ratfuckery in this country, but yeah this probably could end his campaign unless some other evidence against it comes out fast.

The timing of this, seeing some random people on Threads/Twitter say another accusation against him is coming a few hours ago, articles about how to replace a candidate in Maine ready to go right away etc., is definitely really suspicious too. This whole thing fucking sucks dude.

path: 0 24631333, hotness: undefined, score: 55, children: 28
Zaktor 25 points 3 months ago

End his campaign and then what? Why would anyone, with the state the county is in, want Susan Collins to continue to provide a fascist vote?

path: 0 24631333 24631729, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 21
iluvlamp37 22 points 3 months ago

Platner just isn’t going to win after this unless it’s roundly debunked. Would I still vote for him over Collins in November if I lived in Maine? Probably, but I wouldn’t be pumped about it at all anymore.

Best case scenario is he drops out and the Maine DSC nominates a new candidate who isn’t Mills.

path: 0 24631333 24631729 24632045, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 12
Zaktor 12 points 3 months ago

Nominating a new person is a loss. Platner got to where he is because he's an outsider and charismatic. Which is what wins elections. Subbing in someone who the party establishment chooses will be neither of those things.

We're stuck relying on that charisma and anti-establishment sentiment to blow through this. And if many other elections are anything to go by, it's got a good chance of doing so.

path: 0 24631333 24631729 24632045 24632160, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 10
iluvlamp37 14 points 3 months ago

You are asking Democratic voters to overlook a credible rape allegation, we are not Republicans. It’s not going to happen, Platner is not going to win after this.

I don’t know how the Maine DSC works, but it’s not a given they’ll shit out Mills depending how they work. In my state, delegates from each caucus would vote for it, and our delegates this year were HEAVILY left-leaning (a midwestern state).

path: 0 24631333 24631729 24632045 24632160 24632323, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 5
corsicanguppy 2 points 3 months ago

Subbing in someone who the party establishment chooses will be neither of those things.

Yeah. That trick has never worked. Most recently, it didn't work for VP Harris.

path: 0 24631333 24631729 24632045 24632160 24650920, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
velma -6 points 3 months ago

Platner got to where he is because he’s an outsider and charismatic. Which is what wins elections.

Apparently so is forcibly raping people.

path: 0 24631333 24631729 24632045 24632160 24632302, hotness: undefined, score: -6, children: 2
corsicanguppy 2 points 3 months ago

unless it’s roundly debunked

Not possible.

And, honestly, if I were him, I'd cut a deal to just recoup costs and go home.

path: 0 24631333 24631729 24632045 24650899, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
leadore 4 points 3 months ago

Should have thought of that back when Platner's giant red flags were first flown, i.e. from the beginning of his run, when there was still plenty of time to find a better candidate. But no, he had the charisma to suck everyone in, so it was deny, delay, and defend, up to now at the last minute when the evidence has, as it obviously and inevitably would, piled up to undeniable level and everyone is screwed again. smh. He can't win now no matter what.

path: 0 24631333 24631729 24632974, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
marxismtomorrow 1 point 3 months ago

Why do you think someone with a blue tie has to vote blue all the time? Do you think it's a magic tie?

path: 0 24631333 24631729 24631863, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
Zaktor 9 points 3 months ago

We know how Susan Collins votes. We don't need to speculate what her winning will do.

path: 0 24631333 24631729 24631863 24631940, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
marxismtomorrow 2 points 3 months ago

And we know how fascists vote, and its not along party lines. The 'Military History buff' who 'didn't know he had a nazi tattoo,' the 'innocent reformed soldier' who fucking served in Abu Grahib during all the torture, then couldn't get enough of killing civilians so he joined Blackwater, probably isn't going to vote dem regardless of what happens.

Someone having a D next to their name does not magically make them vote the way you want them to, they have no legal or constitutional requirement to do so. Recalls take 2/3rds of a state legislature to vote on it. That's never going to happen even the bluest of states.

path: 0 24631333 24631729 24631863 24631940 24632067, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
velma -1 points 3 months ago

You think the Nazi rapist won't end up casting fascist votes?

path: 0 24631333 24631729 24631752, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 3
Zaktor 7 points 3 months ago

I think you're delusional about the Nazi part and well, being a drunken abuser sucks but it's not going to be as bad as being a known fascist supporter.

If you really want Susan Collins to win, I don't think you have a moral leg to stand on with respect to literally anything else. She's voted for things a million times worse.

path: 0 24631333 24631729 24631752 24631922, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 2
kandoh 4 points 3 months ago

How many signs do you need? It's comical at this point, you're like the West World robots "doesn't look like anything to me"

path: 0 24631333 24631729 24631752 24631922 24632743, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
velma -6 points 3 months ago

Oh I'm delusional about the obvious Nazi tattoos this rapist was sporting? Me? I'm the delusional one?

Hahahahahahahaha

path: 0 24631333 24631729 24631752 24631922 24632001, hotness: undefined, score: -6, children: 0
velma 12 points 3 months ago

Yeah I really wanted to believe that Platner was better than he seemed.

I'm sad to have my expectations met :(

path: 0 24631333 24631373, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 5
NuXCOM_90Percent 24 points 3 months ago

He was a "military history buff" who had no idea what a totenkopf was but miraculously had one on his chest for decades. And he joined fucking Blackwater as a merc. The only thing he had going for him was he said a few good things about health insurance. Oh, and he had no political history at all so there was no track record of him doing anything other than "being an oyster farmer" with his family money.

So many of us were pointing out he was an even shittier version of fetterman (who also had massive red flags everyone chose to ignore). None of this is a surprise.

path: 0 24631333 24631373 24631432, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 2
AWistfulNihilist 15 points 3 months ago

People supported Platner despite his red flags because he's an outsider. Which as you already pointed out, it's exactly how Fetterman got in. There are plenty of candidates who got in who lived a regular life. Plenty of people don't have pasts as sordid as this guy. I can't imagine running at all knowing he has so many skeletons.

path: 0 24631333 24631373 24631432 24631574, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 1
NuXCOM_90Percent 12 points 3 months ago

What is especially frustrating is that one of the other people in the primary basically had a very similar platform AND was also a military vet. But she was a she so of course the podcast bros didn't care.

I get that this is maine so "drain the swamp" probably WAS a smart play but... holy fuck there were so many red flags.


And he had a LOT of support from establishment Democrats since at least January of this year. Which is another thing he and other "outsiders" have in common, I guess.

path: 0 24631333 24631373 24631432 24631574 24631668, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
iluvlamp37 10 points 3 months ago

No real winning outcome on this. A guy with a credible SA allegation doesn’t deserve to be a Senator, we don’t deserve another term of Susan Collins or a Republican majority in Congress. I just don’t think a replacement for Platner is beating Collins

path: 0 24631333 24631373 24631525, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
velma 10 points 3 months ago

He should have never been chosen to run against Collins. Everyone looked past the Nazi tattoo, the sexist and racist comments, and the other sexual assault allegations and now here we are.

path: 0 24631333 24631373 24631525 24631564, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
NuXCOM_90Percent 23 points 3 months ago

So, off the top of my head:

  • Did a tour at Abu Ghraib (yes, THAT Abu Ghraib), decided that wasn't enough, and signed up to Blackwater
  • Brags about how he ignored the rules to fire grenades into civilian centers
  • Had a fucking totenkopf (see: Are We The Baddies?) on his chest for decades
  • Replaced it with a REALLY sketchy "celtic" tattoo
  • Fucking rapist

What next will the evil opposition make up about this wonderful and heroic leftist?

path: 0 24631267, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 3
Asafum 14 points 3 months ago

I love living in America where our choices always seem to be this fucking guy or this fucking guy plus corruption and corporate boot licking.... It's so fucking wonderful that out of 400 million fucking people, these are the people we end up with...

path: 0 24631267 24631888, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 1
NuXCOM_90Percent 4 points 3 months ago

The "good" news is that this is not a uniquely American problem. You just aren't paying attention to other countries' elections.

That said? The key, like in almost all things, is to work with your local party. Folk deeply underestimate the value of having someone in the room (when the cameras are off) saying "Can we maybe not explicitly endorse genocide?" or "People want their tax dollars to go to something that matters". The DSA have finally started to realize that and it is doing wonders. Find the locals who actually would be good candidates and push them in the primaries. And... it gets more than a bit sketchy, but there are also efforts to "import" candidates to some districts with the goal of running them after they "put down roots" for a year or three.

The problem is that people don't want to do that. MAYBE they'll send a text but they expect The Party to provide exactly what they want with no prodding. And, to be fair, for a lot of the most basic of things... the Democrats really shouldn't need to be told. But that leads to people like platner. Borderline sociopaths who just want power who will come out of nowhere, flash some cash, say words they know will get the influencers to talk about them, and win.

Like... it isn't THAT WKUK skit, but https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FtJuiTAR29E kinda sums things up.

path: 0 24631267 24631888 24632189, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
goferking0 1 point 3 months ago

Don't forget wanting to not do anything about the bloated military budget, but instead spend it on just ship building

path: 0 24631267 24635078, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
LuceVendemiaire 18 points 3 months ago

Wonder what all of the people calling us purity-testing republican plants for seeing the blatant signs he was a piece of shit have to say now

path: 0 24631515, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 10
velma 14 points 3 months ago

They're going to ask why this woman is coming forward now and cast doubt on her claims.

They're already doing it in this thread.

path: 0 24631515 24631597, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 9
JollyG 8 points 3 months ago path: 0 24631515 24631597 24632460, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 2
velma 7 points 3 months ago

Oh yeah, we're going to see a lot of Dems and leftists doing the thing they swear only Republicans do.

path: 0 24631515 24631597 24632460 24632494, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
LuceVendemiaire 1 point 3 months ago

my decision to use the block and report buttons at the drop of a coin keeps paying dividends.

Ever since all the KHive and facebook moma moved in bluesky has been unlivable

path: 0 24631515 24631597 24632460 24650262, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
TheRealKuni -1 points 3 months ago
path: 0 24631515 24631597 24631768, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 5
velma 5 points 3 months ago

If you read the article, she explains why.

But you'd rather cast doubt than take a few minutes to read the context.

Racicot previously described “reckless” and “unsettling” behavior by Platner to The New York Times, but says she didn’t go public with the specific assault claim because she didn’t want to be known as a rape victim.

Racicot said she later felt compelled to go public about her experience because the reaction to the Times story was dominated by controversy about another woman, Lyndsey Fifield, who alleged Platner mistreated her and faced attacks because of her ties to the Republican Party. (Contacted by POLITICO, Fifield stood by the allegations she made to the Times and declined to comment further.)

“My part of the story was just a read-over,” Racicot said in an interview. “And the story was Lyndsey, and the accusations of her being politically motivated.”

Racicot said she was torn over coming forward in part because she agrees with Platner politically.

path: 0 24631515 24631597 24631768 24631789, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 4
TheRealKuni 3 points 3 months ago

I think you’ll notice I deleted my comment once I saw that. And also I wasn’t casting doubt. I believe her. And I supplied a possible reason that, as it turns out, was her reason.

path: 0 24631515 24631597 24631768 24631789 24631852, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
ghostpony 14 points 3 months ago
path: 0 24631997, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 1
NuXCOM_90Percent 7 points 3 months ago

I mean... you know that SNL joke about "This is the part of New York that still flies the confederate flag"? Maine is basically an entire state of Upstate New York.

Some of the candidates in the primary actually did seem a lot better. But... rich white blackwater rapist is gonna be hard to beat. Wouldn't be overly shocked if they decide to stay in with a mix of "fake news" and "she was dressed like a slut".

path: 0 24631997 24632342, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
nondescripthandle 10 points 3 months ago

Being a leftist is a lot like pointing to a dead canary in a coal mine and having everyone around you say 'well that could mean anything!' but it turns out it was the most probable thing the whole time. It also means saying 'man I would have loved to be wrong' a whole hell of a lot.

path: 0 24631641, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
Triumph 10 points 3 months ago

Welp, I guess we'll be getting a fascist then.

path: 0 24631715, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 7
velma 10 points 3 months ago

It's just that difficult to find someone who hasn't raped people before apparently.

path: 0 24631715 24631738, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 4
Triumph 6 points 3 months ago

Primaries are over.

path: 0 24631715 24631738 24632065, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 3
velma 4 points 3 months ago

And everyone who brought up concerns before the primaries were over got shouted down to stop purity testing.

path: 0 24631715 24631738 24632065 24632626, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
kandoh 1 point 3 months ago

They've got shit on their face now

path: 0 24631715 24631738 24632065 24632626 24632782, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
prole 5 points 3 months ago

The dude had Nazi tattoos. We were going to get a fascists already.

Maybe now we actually won't.

path: 0 24631715 24637523, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Bronzor 2 points 3 months ago

As if the choices weren't between two fascists....

path: 0 24631715 24650498, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
velma 7 points 3 months ago

Now we know why Platner postponed a bunch of events this week.

path: 0 24631127, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
marxismtomorrow 3 points 3 months ago

The nazi war criminal is also a rapist?

Who knew. Who could have predicted that maybe, just maybe, the far-right would implant someone who is able to keep their mouth shut on their real beliefs long enough to spew out vaguely progressive and left wing points?

path: 0 24631452, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
velma 7 points 3 months ago

What a shocker, right?

path: 0 24631452 24631471, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
bitteroldcoot 2 points 3 months ago

So she chose not to come forward till after the primary????

path: 0 24631361, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 15
NuXCOM_90Percent 6 points 3 months ago

Maybe read the fucking article where that is addressed?

path: 0 24631361 24631379, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 4
bitteroldcoot 13 points 3 months ago

I did.

I also know that politico was bought by a right wing company controlled by this guy.
https://en.wikipedia.org/...

Who describes himself as "non-Jewish Zionist"

Döpfner has been described as a "close associate of Netanyahu."

So yes, i am skeptical of the timing of this. And so should you be.

path: 0 24631361 24631379 24631830, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 3
Bronzor 0 points 3 months ago

Love it how we on the left say "support the victims until proven otherwise." Yet when it is time for action on those words

"Erm actshually this is kinda sus. Should we really believe this chick? She is trying to mess up a good thing for us here guys."

Nevermind this absolute monster of a candidate that went to Iraq 5 times. One of which as a merc for blackwater. Is it really such a logical leap from torturing iraqis to raping women? He probably pulled this heinous shit there too. But remember everyone, only american women are people that deserve to be treated as such. That's why we care only now.

Also love the "non-jewish zionist" point about politico. When platner's step brother (seth frantzman, his father is married to platner's mother) is literally a zionist through and through. Maybe you should do a little more research before being "skeptical". (Bonus points if you can find the sticker that shows how remorsful he is about blackwater on his fridge. Pic taken august 2023)

https://sethfrantzman.com/ (seth frantzman's very own website!)

https://www.amazon.com/... (frantzman's own zionist book on october 7th. He also gave a presentation on his other book "drone wars" for aipac)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LG1eR9wxzhs (frantzman directly talking about his history reporting and following the idf)

https://search.pullpush.io/?author=p-hustle&subreddit=usmc&type=comment&q=kill&sort_type=created_utc&sort=desc&before=1578009600&after=1577836800. (Archive of platners post about loving killing iraqis)

If you didn't know this before, you obviously didn't look hard enough. Platner should've been ditched immediately when he put his name in the running.

path: 0 24631361 24631379 24631830 24650754, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
bitteroldcoot 0 points 3 months ago

Just because Platner has a history of stupid, doesn't mean people can't conspire against him. I would not be surprised if both the accusation, and the defense, were both true. But that doesn't mean we should just swallow whatever a bias media spoon feeds us. Skepticism is always warranted.

Kind of like how even paranoid people have enemies.

path: 0 24631361 24631379 24631830 24650754 24651392, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
NuXCOM_90Percent -8 points 3 months ago

Fake news

path: 0 24631361 24631379 24631830 24632030, hotness: undefined, score: -8, children: 0
velma 6 points 3 months ago

Racicot previously described “reckless” and “unsettling” behavior by Platner to The New York Times, but says she didn’t go public with the specific assault claim because she didn’t want to be known as a rape victim.

Racicot said she later felt compelled to go public about her experience because the reaction to the Times story was dominated by controversy about another woman, Lyndsey Fifield, who alleged Platner mistreated her and faced attacks because of her ties to the Republican Party. (Contacted by POLITICO, Fifield stood by the allegations she made to the Times and declined to comment further.)

“My part of the story was just a read-over,” Racicot said in an interview. “And the story was Lyndsey, and the accusations of her being politically motivated.”

Racicot said she was torn over coming forward in part because she agrees with Platner politically.

We all chose not to believe Lyndsey Fifield because she's conservative.

path: 0 24631361 24631386, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 5
Zaktor 19 points 3 months ago

That's a perfectly good reason to not believe someone. Conservatives lie. Regularly and with glee. Especially when it will benefit them politically. It's ok to treat politically beneficial claims from conservative operatives as likely lies.

path: 0 24631361 24631386 24631698, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 4
velma 0 points 3 months ago

Well she was fucking right this time.

path: 0 24631361 24631386 24631698 24631709, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 3
Zaktor 14 points 3 months ago

Someone being truthful once doesn't mean they are trustworthy or should have been trusted. If conservative operatives wanted to be given good faith they shouldn't have spent their entire career gleefully abusing it. It's perfectly fine to require exceptional proof from known liars.

path: 0 24631361 24631386 24631698 24631709 24631864, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 2
marxismtomorrow 3 points 3 months ago

A) believe all women.

B) Maybe she didn't want a traumatic experience public until there was no other choice to keep her assaulter out of office and out of power?

path: 0 24631361 24631414, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
velma 8 points 3 months ago

Racicot previously described “reckless” and “unsettling” behavior by Platner to The New York Times, but says she didn’t go public with the specific assault claim because she didn’t want to be known as a rape victim.

That's exactly one of the reasons why she didn't come forward sooner.

The Dems and those on the left all collectively rejected Lyndsey Fifield's accusation against Platner. I hope we don't treat this woman the same.

path: 0 24631361 24631414 24631459, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
KnitWit 6 points 3 months ago

It makes me sad knowing how controversial the statement ‘believe all women’ is on this site.

path: 0 24631361 24631414 24631887, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
NuXCOM_90Percent 3 points 3 months ago

This place is REAL reddit-y in the ways that matter.

path: 0 24631361 24631414 24631887 24632450, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
infinitesunrise 2 points 3 months ago

The last time I had to vote in a federal election between a Republican and a Democrat man with sexual assault allegations, I was getting scolded and yelled at by Democrats on the internet for considering abstaining. So just in case those scolds are still around, I recommend still voting Platner.

path: 0 24631747, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 16
null 6 points 3 months ago

Still around, yes people should still vote blue.

path: 0 24631747 24632542, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
velma -16 points 3 months ago

Last time I checked, Collins didn't rape anyone.

It's a bad choice between the two admittedly, but I'll side eye anyone who votes Platner after being real cheeky about the Epstein files.

path: 0 24631747 24631769, hotness: undefined, score: -16, children: 14
infinitesunrise 8 points 3 months ago

This was a cynical reference to Biden 2020, I don't think it's a stretch to assume that the money behind Planter oppo research that lands in the NYTimes is the same money that was behind Biden. Not that I don't find the SA allegations against both men credible, I certainly do.

It's just that only one of the Maine candidates has a long and well-documented track record of voting for fascist policies that have negatively affected millions of women. They're a known quantity, verifiably and provably awful.

Side eyes from anyone wouldn't stop me from making what I felt was the less harmful choice, but I'm not a Maine resident.

path: 0 24631747 24631769 24632055, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 7
prole 3 points 3 months ago

Biden did not have credible allegations against him

path: 0 24631747 24631769 24632055 24637555, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
velma -5 points 3 months ago

I'm sick of those on the left pretending to be champions of women's rights in general. Y'all don't give a fuck clearly. Platner is your man through and through, it's all the fucking same all the way through, blue or red, left or right.

Our rape culture is out of fucking control.

path: 0 24631747 24631769 24632055 24632119, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 5
infinitesunrise 9 points 3 months ago

So what are you advocating for then? Voters abstain? Voters pick Collins?

Sorry I understand the outrage but is it just too much for someone to admit they'd make a weighed choice between two bad options? What's missing?

path: 0 24631747 24631769 24632055 24632119 24632157, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 4
Zaktor 6 points 3 months ago

Ok, so you're literally a fascist supporter.

path: 0 24631747 24631769 24631998, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
velma -4 points 3 months ago

I'm morally against electing rapist Nazis.

path: 0 24631747 24631769 24631998 24632020, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 0
BigMacHole 5 points 3 months ago

EXACTLY! I'd MUCH rather Vote for the Woman who Indirectly Killed MILLIONS OF AMERICAN CHILDREN INSTEAD of the Man Republicans keep accusing of Rape!

path: 0 24631747 24631769 24632487, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
velma -1 points 3 months ago

You think the man who was a mercenary contract killer didn't kill children?

path: 0 24631747 24631769 24632487 24632514, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
prole 3 points 3 months ago

I would personally never vote for Susan Collins.

I'd just sit out before doing that.

path: 0 24631747 24631769 24637548, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
velma -1 points 3 months ago

I’d rather sit out than vote for either at this point myself.

It is sickening the amount of justification for electing a rapist I am seeing here.

path: 0 24631747 24631769 24637548 24637585, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
Auk -2 points 3 months ago

I’m calling bs. Smells like a coordinated effort to reëlect Collins. Convenient timing.

path: 0 24632752, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 2
NuXCOM_90Percent 8 points 3 months ago

platner seems to have a LOT of those coordinated effforts put out against him. Like a whole new controversy every month it feels like. I especially hated the one where those evil establishment Democrats got him drunk twenty years ago, tattooed a nazi symbol onto him, and then got him drunk every single for almost twenty years since so that he wouldn't know it was there until it was too late!

Also

Believe women. Except when it would be inconvenient to me. Then they are all liars out for sperm

path: 0 24632752 24632871, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
velma 6 points 3 months ago

Believe women.

path: 0 24632752 24632840, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
theuniqueone -18 points 3 months ago

This scandal proves again democrats don't care anymore than republicans do about sexual assault on women despite their pretenses.

path: 0 24634151, hotness: undefined, score: -18, children: 3
lennybird 15 points 3 months ago

Have this user tagged tankie both sideser lol.

Platner likely to step down and many have retracted endorsements.

Actually proving the opposite: Dems hold themselves to a much higher standard.

Same cannot be said for GOP President and rapist and pedophile they all continue to support in lockstep. Sit the fuck down.

path: 0 24634151 24634507, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 2
theuniqueone -8 points 3 months ago

Look into the comments on these they are people defending him still and I'm no "tankie" whatever you think that means.

path: 0 24634151 24634507 24634638, hotness: undefined, score: -8, children: 1
lennybird 7 points 3 months ago

If it was a binary choice between he and Collins who continues to simp for a rapist pedophile and promote atrocious actions like the Iran war, or enabling revocation of USAID that has already led to the death of thousands of children, yes I'm voting Platner who is only accused, not convicted. This is the logical and ethical thing to do.

path: 0 24634151 24634507 24634638 24634664, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
politics
politics

@lemmy.world

login for more options
31376
33947
9297

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

go to feed...