I refuse to call it a store. I can't walk into it and pick up a box from the shelf with physical install media. It's a software repository with paywalls.

I have him tagged as "corporate shill", so I guess he just does this type of shit.

This is true, but it just makes the point all the more relevant.

The Google Pixel 10 (latest/best; the 11 is coming soon) benchmarks similarly to an iPhone 11 from 2019. Sure, there are other factors, but the Pixel 10 costs the same as the iPhone, and the Pixel 10 Pro is priced competitively (if not the same) as the iPhone Pro.

Samsung Galaxy phones are more powerful than Pixels, and in some benchmarks, match or exceed the iPhone of the same year/generation. However, when they both throttle (due to heat), the Snapdragon chip loses more power. Granted, this only happens in top-end games, so for most uses, the Galaxy might be slightly more powerful.

If you're going for a cheap Android phone, you're getting a lot less performance. Or it's only available in China or some other weird restriction.

Either way, they all run Google's spyware. Google was recently forced to disclose how much money they make per year on the average Android user. It's something like $1700. According to George Carlin, half the people are below it, but conversely, half the people are above it. Google gave one example of a corporate suit making them tens of thousands of dollars each year. And yet, they're charging modern iPhone prices for 2019 iPhone performance, and they're double dipping by selling your personal information wholesale.

You can speculate that Apple does the same, or may in the future, but we know what Google makes per Android user, we know what power Google puts in their phone, and we know what Google charges per phone. So again, that makes me ask why you would use an OS from an advertising company when a computer company is making phones as well. Again, "Leopards Ate My Face" moment.

I've been an Android user since 2010 (and an iPhone user since 2016). There's always been an anti-Apple sentiment in the Android community. To be fair, this is almost entirely the fault of Steve Jobs, who swore he would wage "thermonuclear war" on Android, that he would bankrupt Apple to "right this wrong" and called Android "a stolen product". Steve Jobs was also an arsehole and possibly a pederast who made sexually suggestive remarks to his daughter (according to her, he asked her if she'd learned to masturbate yet, daily, and when she finally said yes, he told her she'd be real popular with men). There was a lot wrong with the guy. He then released his phone on only a couple carriers, so Android was kind of a necessity if you lived in an area where one of those chosen carriers didn't cover (like I did — the iPhone wasn't even an option for me until the 5s) and then attacked the competition for doing what he didn't or couldn't.

Still, there has always been this animosity towards iPhone users. To me, they served two different markets. Android was kind of the wild west back then. I never had an Android phone I didn't run custom firmware on until I got my Galaxy S10 (which cannot be unlocked). It was all about new experiences and "what can we do with the platform?". It was awesome. Meanwhile, iPhone was always just this handheld Mac you could put in your pocket, and it could also make phone calls. For people who just want their phone to be like their computer, boring but with whatever wallpaper, it's fine. iPhone is predictable. It does innovate and it has and Android has copied plenty from it, but of course the inverse is also true.

But no, the Android users I talked to didn't think Google was screwing them at all. They thought they were rebels for not using the iPhone. Like the iPhone was a "Fisher-Price" or "baby's first" phone for people not smart enough to use Android. They always acted like Google had their back. Even the "privacy focused" custom firmware GrapheneOS requires you buy a Pixel. So you have to pay Google to get into their ecosystem, though they're now expanding to Motorola (which has never been great with smartphones, and no, not including the one you think, though IIRC the Atrix was the first smartphone with a fingerprint reader?). So yeah, all these guys who said having Android made them better than the iPhone users who are now saying Google is trying to make Android into iOS — yeah, I think leopards ate their face.

Hell he's paying Sam Altman for all these tokens

Don't need to. I actually care about other people and don't like people getting fucked over by nonsense.

You're going to need to enlighten us some because LiGNUTs will call just about anything malware. -But yes; there is a malware 'issue'. It's far from how dangerous and chaotic F-Droid is. The Play Store is still objectively the safest place to get Android apps.

The stuff that slips through gets quickly removed, they block millions of attempts, and are tightening policies.

Would be interested in your technical analysis of current F-Droid security vs current Play Store with examples.

You're wasting my time. -Mind just shutting tf up?

IDC about your conspiracy theories, and love that my software is improved by telemetry, ads are made more efficient to keep prices down, and developers of my favorite programs get paid for their work.

Lol, did I ask for 2024, or a one-sided info? (Framed as propaganda)