Obtainium Users: What do you think about the new UI?

a month ago by AstroLightz to c/degoogle

Since v1.6, Obtainium has switched to using Material 3 Expressive for its UI.

Personally, I don't like it as it uses up more space to show less information. The old UI (v1.5 and below) had everything visible and was easy to navigate.

But what do you think? Do you like it? What would you want improved or changed?

dadarobot 12 points a month ago

i like the new design. looks nicer

path: 0 24847134, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
Samsy 10 points a month ago

Oh, it's an open source tool, that I really enjoy. If they change some optical blobs, idc.

path: 0 24848419, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
Atomic_Edge 1 point a month ago

Unnecessary UI and layout redesigns are one of my biggest pet peeves with software. Just as users get comfortable and build muscle memory, developers push an update that completely scrambles the layout, forcing everyone to re-learn basic workflows.

A recent example is the Samsung built-in photo editor—it used to be simple and efficient, but recent UI updates ruined the experience to the point where I'd rather just export to GIMP.

Software should follow the core Unix philosophy: Do one thing, and do it well ~Doug McIlroy Apple and Google lost the plot on this years ago. When users rely on a product, constant arbitrary layout changes destroy usability. If developers insist on overhaul updates, the absolute bare minimum should be providing clear release notes or documentation explaining the new layout idk just me I guess good app tho.

path: 0 24848419 24933530, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
dodge_fiction109 5 points a month ago path: 0 24846798, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 4
ScoffingLizard 1 point 22 days ago

I tried obtainx but still got tye se error that it couldn't get the repo. When I added the repo I needed to Fdroid it seemed to work.

path: 0 24846798 25013894, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
AstroLightz 1 point a month ago

I don't know as I've never used ObtainX, but from screenshots I saw its F-Droid page, it looks similar. I wished they kept the previous UI or at least an option to switch back.

path: 0 24846798 24847056, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
MonaySimpson 1 point a month ago

Interesting

Build Verification* — cryptographic checks (F-Droid/Izzy reproducible builds and GitHub Release Attestations) flag manipulated binaries before install. ObtainX's own updates carry GitHub attestations too

Although some of the options, as a guess, seem to use AI (?).

Seems like a win though if thw dev can be trusted.

path: 0 24846798 24848530, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
jaygray91 1 point a month ago

Somewhat but also not. I tried ObtainX when obtainium was still using the old UI and I got along fine on obtainx. Obtainx does use more of the expressive material design language but it makes sense to me

But somehow when obtainium changed to this new UI I just can't get my head around it. So weird.

path: 0 24846798 24849138, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
RodgeGrabTheCat 5 points a month ago

Change for the sake of change. The new ui seems like a waste of time.

path: 0 24847139, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 5
Kirk 1 point a month ago

Source for that claim? My understanding is that the changes were for usability purposes.

path: 0 24847139 24849600, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 4
RodgeGrabTheCat 1 point a month ago

Thats an opinion, not a claim.

path: 0 24847139 24849600 24850393, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
garrick42 3 points a month ago

It's also just your opinion that the change was for the sake of it.

path: 0 24847139 24849600 24850393 24850825, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
RodgeGrabTheCat 0 points a month ago

Yes an opinion based on nothing but my feels.

path: 0 24847139 24849600 24850393 24850825 24851250, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
Kirk 1 point a month ago
path: 0 24847139 24849600 24850393 24862340, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
akunohana 4 points a month ago

I don't hate the new aesthetics! I too preferred the previous design, but this is fine too.

With that said, to illustrate how grateful I am to ImranR98, I'll add this: I'd be using this app of his even if it looked like an old plain text document. 😁

path: 0 24847392, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
noodNinja 4 points a month ago

It needs to be fixed. I was literally looking at it last night thinking WTF the top 25% of my screen is being wasted. There's nothing in it. Also clicked the update/install button assuming it would save me needing to manually press update on every app. It wanted to install a bunch of deleted apps that are still in the list. Sure they could improve the visuals and feel but this isn't it.

path: 0 24852841, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
shiftymccool 3 points a month ago

This is an app i use probably 2 minutes a month. The efficiency of the layout is so not important

path: 0 24856493, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
pineapple 3 points a month ago

Looks more complete alongside the rest of my apps which mostly use the same theme.

path: 0 24854242, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
communism 2 points a month ago

I prefer the new design personally. Might be imagining things, but I feel like it's been less buggy/felt easier to use too.

path: 0 24857022, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
kepix 1 point a month ago

the small progress bar makes no sense. either use a piechart next the name, or use the full width with a big progress bar under every app.

path: 0 24851127, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
XLE 1 point a month ago

It seems easier to update multiple apps at once from the main screen, which makes it good enough for me.

path: 0 24859510, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Zwuzelmaus -2 points a month ago

I have never really understood it - no matter which version. I just guess and tap somewhere, and then usually I succeed after a while.

path: 0 24846147, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
degoogle
degoogle

@lemmy.ml

login for more options
17585
712
1211

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

  1. Be respectful even in disagreement

  2. No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.

  3. No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

!privacyguides@lemmy.one !privacy@lemmy.ml !privatelife@lemmy.ml !linuxphones@lemmy.ml !fossdroid@social.fossware.space !fdroid@lemmy.ml

go to feed...