AppManager makes AppImages easier to install and use on Ubuntu

a month ago by Leo to c/news

AppImages are designed to be simple. Download one, make it executable and run it. On Ubuntu, though, there's an extra step: Ubuntu ships FUSE 3 by
shrugs 0 points a month ago

am I the only one that thinks this kind of software is dumb?

what does it do? copies files to ~/Applications, provides a was to run Appimages without the need for fuse2, provides a mac like way to install Appimages?

Nothing this app does is more then a one liner for every competent user. why bother?

oh yeah, it's Ubuntu...

path: 0 24898020, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 7
leo 3 points a month ago

Doubtful. And for the same reason this ‘basically-a-one-liner’ is neat

Not everybody knows or cares what a one liner is. Noe everyone is a competent user. Some people just want to drag and drop. Some people come from the Mac world and want things to work that way. Some people don’t and still want it 🤷

Linux is pretty big these days.

path: 0 24898020 24898609, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
HubertManne 2 points a month ago

I use appman which is more of a repo for appimages. I will try this for one important reason. "AppManager is open source and, naturally, distributed as an AppImage itself." This is essentially what I have been looking for. maybe. I want something like appman that is a gui that is itself an appimage and further gives a gui start menu kind of thing. why? because then you can just move a folder to a new machine and boom you have all your software ready to go.

path: 0 24898020 24900474, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 4
recursivethinking 1 point a month ago

I'm not sure I really understand this. I mean I understand the goal, but do we not have that without the manager piece?

So like I have a folder called AppImages. I right-click properties allow exec. I make a menu launcher.

I can now move that folder to a new PC, and ... Maybe this is where it shines?... I don't have to right click on each and I don't have to make launchets for each (or clone the menu folder i guess).

Or does it like ... Check for newer versions or something? What am I missing?

I strongly prefer AppImages for a number of reasons so I'm all about having something useful for them.

path: 0 24898020 24900474 24903354, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
HubertManne 3 points a month ago

I have not used it yet but what im hoping is it will do updates like appman (which basically acts like a software distro manager ala yum, apt, etc) and a start menu for things in the directory. Basically this is how portable apps works with windows and I hope to replicate it in linux. Each level sorta helps. like appimages themselves are fine but then appman makes installation and update and removal more organized. having it install as an appimage and be a gui would be a bit upgrade and having it act as a gui start menu to all the apps would be further more of one. what I have now works alright but I would not mind it being a bit better.

path: 0 24898020 24900474 24903354 24903539, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
recursivethinking 1 point a month ago

Ah yeah I got ya. Thinking about it, having AppImage manager (and one that keeps things updated) would be pretty nice.

I actually have Autonomix b ikmarked to try, it promises to do similar. I currently use deb-get for deb package management but I winter something less tied to deb

path: 0 24898020 24900474 24903354 24903539 24921337, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
BradleyUffner 1 point a month ago

Does your one liner automatically check for and install updates?

path: 0 24898020 24904288, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
news
news

@lemmy.linuxuserspace.show

login for more options
3642
1500
752

This is where all the News about Linux and Linux adjacent things goes. We'll use some of the articles here for the show! You can watch or listen at:

You can also get involved at our forum here on Lemmy:

Or just get the most recent episode of the show here:

go to feed...