Where do these values come from because all I find when searching for 140,000 renewable-related deaths are references to wildlife deaths, and if this is the case it's pretty disingenuous to compare against nuclear accident deaths of humans.

This article has a more sensible comparison that ties deaths to the amount of power generated:

Energy Source Mortality Rate (deaths/trillionkWhr)

Coal – global average 100,000 (41% global electricity)

Coal – China 170,000 (75% China’s electricity)

Coal – U.S. 10,000 (32% U.S. electricity)

Oil 36,000 (33% of energy, 8% of electricity)

Natural Gas 4,000 (22% global electricity)

Biofuel/Biomass 24,000 (21% global energy)

Solar (rooftop) 440 (< 1% global electricity)

Wind 150 (2% global electricity)

Hydro – global average 1,400 (16% global electricity)

Hydro – U.S. 5 (6% U.S. electricity)

Nuclear – global average 90 (11% global electricity w/Chern&Fukush)

Nuclear – U.S. 0.1 (19% U.S. electricity)

I still.cant find where these figures are sourced, but at least these figures account for the actual amount of generation in proportion to deaths.

There are more people eating sharks than there are sharks eating people.

We are in their territory. We get to be apex predator in land. They get to be apex predator in sea. This is an agreement we've had for a long time.